strange stack outputs in WinDBG

All,

My machine at work has been running slow. In an effort to see what’s going on with it I enabled the user initiated BSOD (right ctrl+scroll lock) and had a look at the dump file. In the stacks I am seeing what I believe are just addresses in where normally you would see an export. I am by no means skilled at kernel development, but I don’t think this is right. I think what Windbg is telling me is that it can’t find any symbol for this function call. If that is true how do I find out more info about it? Is this the actual address where this instruction is from? I have included a copy and paste of what I am talking about. If I could just be pointed in the correct direction that would be great.


Child-SP RetAddr Call Site
fffff880029bc800 fffff800030d46c2 nt!KiSwapContext+0x7a
fffff880029bc940 fffff800030e5a9f nt!KiCommitThreadWait+0x1d2
fffff880029bc9d0 fffff800033d41de nt!KeWaitForSingleObject+0x19f
fffff880029bca70 fffff800030ddf13 nt!NtWaitForSingleObject+0xde
fffff880029bcae0 00000000773b135a nt!KiSystemServiceCopyEnd+0x13 (TrapFrame @ fffff880029bcae0)<br> 000000000017f748 0000000000000000 0x773b135a &lt;----- This is what I am talking about<br><br>if anyone is looking for more detailed output here it is:<br><br>THREAD fffffa800a7eab60 Cid 01f4.0200 Teb: 000007fffffdd000 Win32Thread: fffff900c1d2a6a0 WAIT: (UserRequest) UserMode Non-Alertable<br> fffffa800a7f3430 SynchronizationEvent<br> Not impersonating<br> DeviceMap fffff8a000008e00<br> Owning Process fffffa800a7e1a70 Image: svchost.exe<br> Attached Process N/A Image: N/A<br> Wait Start TickCount 15560798 Ticks: 15376 (0:00:03:59.867)<br> Context Switch Count 4945 LargeStack<br> UserTime 00:00:00.031<br> KernelTime 00:00:00.031<br> Win32 Start Address 0x00000000ff84246c<br> Stack Init fffff880029bcc70 Current fffff880029bc7c0<br> Base fffff880029bd000 Limit fffff880029b7000 Call 0<br> Priority 9 BasePriority 8 UnusualBoost 0 ForegroundBoost 0 IoPriority 2 PagePriority 5<br> Kernel stack not resident.<br> Child-SP RetAddr Call Site<br> fffff880029bc800 fffff800030d46c2 nt!KiSwapContext+0x7a<br> fffff880029bc940 fffff800030e5a9f nt!KiCommitThreadWait+0x1d2<br> fffff880029bc9d0 fffff800033d41de nt!KeWaitForSingleObject+0x19f<br> fffff880029bca70 fffff800030ddf13 nt!NtWaitForSingleObject+0xde<br> fffff880029bcae0 00000000773b135a nt!KiSystemServiceCopyEnd+0x13 (TrapFrame @ fffff880029bcae0)
000000000017f748 0000000000000000 0x773b135a

I don’t even have any keywords I can google to find out more. Any and all help is welcomed.

Thank you very much in advance,

-JC

xxxxx@comcast.net wrote:

My machine at work has been running slow. In an effort to see what’s going on with it I enabled the user initiated BSOD (right ctrl+scroll lock) and had a look at the dump file. In the stacks I am seeing what I believe are just addresses in where normally you would see an export. I am by no means skilled at kernel development, but I don’t think this is right. I think what Windbg is telling me is that it can’t find any symbol for this function call. If that is true how do I find out more info about it? Is this the actual address where this instruction is from? I have included a copy and paste of what I am talking about. If I could just be pointed in the correct direction that would be great.


> Child-SP RetAddr Call Site
> fffff880029bc800 fffff800030d46c2 nt!KiSwapContext+0x7a
> fffff880029bc940 fffff800030e5a9f nt!KiCommitThreadWait+0x1d2
> fffff880029bc9d0 fffff800033d41de nt!KeWaitForSingleObject+0x19f
> fffff880029bca70 fffff800030ddf13 nt!NtWaitForSingleObject+0xde
> fffff880029bcae0 00000000773b135a nt!KiSystemServiceCopyEnd+0x13 (TrapFrame @ fffff880029bcae0)<br>&gt; 000000000017f748 00000000`00000000 0x773b135a <----- This is what I am talking about

That’s where it has crossed into user mode. If you took a kernel mode
dump, then it doesn’t include any user-mode memory, so it can’t figure
out what DLL is mapped at that address in that process.

In any case, this is a dead end. This thread is waiting for something.
It’s not using CPU.


Tim Roberts, xxxxx@probo.com
Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.

Thank You Tim! and lucky for me I took an Entire Memory Dump. While I was poking around in the registry I decided it would be a good idea to manually enable that. So what I should be looking for is how to follow stacks going from ring 0 to ring 3 (for example) ?

Thanks in advance,

-JC

>So what I should be looking for is how to follow stacks going from ring 0

to ring 3 (for example) ?

It’s a little tricky, so I discussed this in detail in an article:

http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?article=576

-scott


Scott Noone
Consulting Associate and Chief System Problem Analyst
OSR Open Systems Resources, Inc.
http://www.osronline.com

wrote in message news:xxxxx@windbg…

Thank You Tim! and lucky for me I took an Entire Memory Dump. While I was
poking around in the registry I decided it would be a good idea to manually
enable that. So what I should be looking for is how to follow stacks going
from ring 0 to ring 3 (for example) ?

Thanks in advance,

-JC

You can use “!process 1f” as a shorthand, to dump all of the threads out while using the PTEs of that process.

Note that if the data was paged out then there’s nothing you can really do here.

- S (Msft)

-----Original Message-----
From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com [mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of xxxxx@comcast.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 4:12 PM
To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
Subject: RE:[windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG

Thank You Tim! and lucky for me I took an Entire Memory Dump. While I was poking around in the registry I decided it would be a good idea to manually enable that. So what I should be looking for is how to follow stacks going from ring 0 to ring 3 (for example) ?

Thanks in advance,

-JC


WINDBG is sponsored by OSR

For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
http://www.osr.com/seminars

To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer

For completeness, !thread also supports flag 0x10 (which is the important
one for including user mode state). Both of these are explained in the
article for the curious.

-scott


Scott Noone
Consulting Associate and Chief System Problem Analyst
OSR Open Systems Resources, Inc.
http://www.osronline.com

“Skywing” wrote in message news:xxxxx@windbg…

You can use “!process 1f” as a shorthand, to dump all of the
threads out while using the PTEs of that process.

Note that if the data was paged out then there’s nothing you can really do
here.

- S (Msft)

-----Original Message-----
From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of
xxxxx@comcast.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 4:12 PM
To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
Subject: RE:[windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG

Thank You Tim! and lucky for me I took an Entire Memory Dump. While I was
poking around in the registry I decided it would be a good idea to manually
enable that. So what I should be looking for is how to follow stacks going
from ring 0 to ring 3 (for example) ?

Thanks in advance,

-JC


WINDBG is sponsored by OSR

For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
http://www.osr.com/seminars

To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer

This is where the Black Art resides :slight_smile:

I usually look at the windbg help, then fire .chain then look at the helps
related to those extension commands. Finally the blogs ( including Urs :).

But docs fail very short of what one would like to see. Dang I thought it
is a piler and it is working as a wrench.

As a TA, I once had to tell a student, Your answers to these probability
questions themselves are probabilities - now I think about them, applies to
myself and smile…

-pro

On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Scott Noone wrote:

> For completeness, !thread also supports flag 0x10 (which is the important
> one for including user mode state). Both of these are explained in the
> article for the curious.
>
>
> -scott
>
> –
> Scott Noone
> Consulting Associate and Chief System Problem Analyst
> OSR Open Systems Resources, Inc.
> http://www.osronline.com
>
> “Skywing” wrote in message news:xxxxx@windbg…
>
>
> You can use “!process 1f” as a shorthand, to dump all of the
> threads out while using the PTEs of that process.
>
> Note that if the data was paged out then there’s nothing you can really do
> here.
>
> - S (Msft)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.**com[mailto:
> bounce-500444-39740@**lists.osr.com ]
> On Behalf Of xxxxx@comcast.net
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 4:12 PM
> To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
> Subject: RE:[windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG
>
> Thank You Tim! and lucky for me I took an Entire Memory Dump. While I was
> poking around in the registry I decided it would be a good idea to manually
> enable that. So what I should be looking for is how to follow stacks going
> from ring 0 to ring 3 (for example) ?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> -JC
>
> —
> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>
> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>
> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> http://www.osronline.com/page. cfm?name=ListServerhttp:
>
> —
> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>
> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>
> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> http://www.osronline.com/page.
cfm?name=ListServerhttp:
></http:></http:>

Thank you guys for all of the feedback and the article! When I get half a second I will have a better look at it but it seems that it will at least point me in the right direction. Also I am doing this through DMP files that I trigger manually so I don’t think I can change contexts like that and I know I can not resume execution, but I am sure I will be able to adapt!

Thanks Again!

-JC

>Also I am doing this through DMP files that I trigger manually so I don’t

think I can change contexts like that

It is possible to change contexts in a dump file, assuming that it’s a full
memory dump (though, as Ken noted, there are still limitations based on what
was actually in memory at the time of the crash). See the second half of the
article I posted starting at the section titled, “What About Crash Dumps?”

-scott


Scott Noone
Consulting Associate and Chief System Problem Analyst
OSR Open Systems Resources, Inc.
http://www.osronline.com

wrote in message news:xxxxx@windbg…

Thank you guys for all of the feedback and the article! When I get half a
second I will have a better look at it but it seems that it will at least
point me in the right direction. Also I am doing this through DMP files that
I trigger manually so I don’t think I can change contexts like that and I
know I can not resume execution, but I am sure I will be able to adapt!

Thanks Again!

-JC

Use the ?Send Feedback? link conveniently placed on every doc page in these circumstances (otherwise the chances are slim to none that the documentation will change on its own based on unvoiced feedback).

  • S (Msft)

From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com [mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Prokash Sinha
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 8:10 AM
To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
Subject: Re: [windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG

This is where the Black Art resides :slight_smile:

I usually look at the windbg help, then fire .chain then look at the helps related to those extension commands. Finally the blogs ( including Urs :).

But docs fail very short of what one would like to see. Dang I thought it is a piler and it is working as a wrench.

As a TA, I once had to tell a student, Your answers to these probability questions themselves are probabilities - now I think about them, applies to myself and smile…

-pro

On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Scott Noone > wrote:
For completeness, !thread also supports flag 0x10 (which is the important one for including user mode state). Both of these are explained in the article for the curious.

-scott


Scott Noone
Consulting Associate and Chief System Problem Analyst
OSR Open Systems Resources, Inc.
http://www.osronline.com
“Skywing” wrote in message news:xxxxx@windbg…

You can use “!process 1f” as a shorthand, to dump all of the threads out while using the PTEs of that process.

Note that if the data was paged out then there’s nothing you can really do here.

- S (Msft)

-----Original Message-----
From: xxxxx@lists.osr.commailto:xxxxx [mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.commailto:xxxxx] On Behalf Of xxxxx@comcast.netmailto:xxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 4:12 PM
To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
Subject: RE:[windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG
Thank You Tim! and lucky for me I took an Entire Memory Dump. While I was poking around in the registry I decided it would be a good idea to manually enable that. So what I should be looking for is how to follow stacks going from ring 0 to ring 3 (for example) ?

Thanks in advance,

-JC


WINDBG is sponsored by OSR

For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
http://www.osr.com/seminars

To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer


WINDBG is sponsored by OSR

For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit: http://www.osr.com/seminars

To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer

— WINDBG is sponsored by OSR For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit: http://www.osr.com/seminars To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer</mailto:xxxxx></mailto:xxxxx></mailto:xxxxx>

Yeah, I will have to start doing this… Let’s see.

On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Skywing wrote:

> Use the ?Send Feedback? link conveniently placed on every doc page in
> these circumstances (otherwise the chances are slim to none that the
> documentation will change on its own based on unvoiced feedback).
>
>
**
>
> - S (Msft)

>
> ****
>
> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com [mailto:
> xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Prokash Sinha
> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 8:10 AM
> To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
> Subject: Re: [windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG
>
>
**
>
> This is where the Black Art resides :slight_smile:

>
> ****
>
> I usually look at the windbg help, then fire .chain then look at the
> helps related to those extension commands. Finally the blogs ( including
> Urs :).
>
>

>
> But docs fail very short of what one would like to see. Dang I thought it
> is a piler and it is working as a wrench.

>
> ****
>
> As a TA, I once had to tell a student, Your answers to these probability
> questions themselves are probabilities - now I think about them, applies to
> myself and smile…
>
>

>
> -pro

>
> ****
>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Scott Noone wrote:

>
> For completeness, !thread also supports flag 0x10 (which is the important
> one for including user mode state). Both of these are explained in the
> article for the curious.

>
>
>
> -scott
>
> –
> Scott Noone
> Consulting Associate and Chief System Problem Analyst
> OSR Open Systems Resources, Inc.
> http://www.osronline.com
>
> “Skywing” wrote in message news:xxxxx@windbg…

>
>
>
> You can use “!process 1f” as a shorthand, to dump all of the
> threads out while using the PTEs of that process.
>
> Note that if the data was paged out then there’s nothing you can really do
> here.
>
> - S (Msft)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com [mailto:
> xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of xxxxx@comcast.net
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 4:12 PM
> To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
> Subject: RE:[windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG
**
>
> Thank You Tim! and lucky for me I took an Entire Memory Dump. While I was
> poking around in the registry I decided it would be a good idea to manually
> enable that. So what I should be looking for is how to follow stacks going
> from ring 0 to ring 3 (for example) ?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> -JC
>
> —
> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>
> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>
> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>
> —
> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>
> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>
> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer****
>
> ****
>
> — WINDBG is sponsored by OSR For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and
> other seminars visit: http://www.osr.com/seminars To unsubscribe, visit
> the List Server section of OSR Online at
> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer ****
>
> —
> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>
> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>
> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>

The problem is that the “send feedback” link, at least the last time I
clicked on one, wanted to send email. I have ten machines here, and only
two of them have email capability. Neither of these machines are my
development machine, where I read the documentation.

There are many unfortunate assumptions Microsoft makes, and one of them is
that every machine has email connectivity.
joe

Yeah, I will have to start doing this… Let’s see.

On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Skywing
wrote:
>
>> Use the ‘Send Feedback’ link conveniently placed on every doc page in
>> these circumstances (otherwise the chances are slim to none that the
>> documentation will change on its own based on unvoiced feedback).
>>
>>
**
>>
>> - S (Msft)

>>
>> ****
>>
>> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com [mailto:
>> xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Prokash Sinha
>> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 8:10 AM
>> To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
>> Subject: Re: [windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG
>>
>>
**
>>
>> This is where the Black Art resides :slight_smile:

>>
>> ****
>>
>> I usually look at the windbg help, then fire .chain then look at the
>> helps related to those extension commands. Finally the blogs ( including
>> Urs :).
>>
>>

>>
>> But docs fail very short of what one would like to see. Dang I thought
>> it
>> is a piler and it is working as a wrench.

>>
>> ****
>>
>> As a TA, I once had to tell a student, Your answers to these probability
>> questions themselves are probabilities - now I think about them, applies
>> to
>> myself and smile…
>>
>>

>>
>> -pro

>>
>> ****
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Scott Noone wrote:

>>
>> For completeness, !thread also supports flag 0x10 (which is the
>> important
>> one for including user mode state). Both of these are explained in the
>> article for the curious.

>>
>>
>>
>> -scott
>>
>> –
>> Scott Noone
>> Consulting Associate and Chief System Problem Analyst
>> OSR Open Systems Resources, Inc.
>> http://www.osronline.com
>>
>> “Skywing” wrote in message news:xxxxx@windbg…

>>
>>
>>
>> You can use “!process 1f” as a shorthand, to dump all of the
>> threads out while using the PTEs of that process.
>>
>> Note that if the data was paged out then there’s nothing you can really
>> do
>> here.
>>
>> - S (Msft)
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com [mailto:
>> xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of xxxxx@comcast.net
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 4:12 PM
>> To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
>> Subject: RE:[windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG
**
>>
>> Thank You Tim! and lucky for me I took an Entire Memory Dump. While I
>> was
>> poking around in the registry I decided it would be a good idea to
>> manually
>> enable that. So what I should be looking for is how to follow stacks
>> going
>> from ring 0 to ring 3 (for example) ?
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> -JC
>>
>> —
>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>>
>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>>
>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>>
>> —
>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>>
>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>>
>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> — WINDBG is sponsored by OSR For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging
>> and
>> other seminars visit: http://www.osr.com/seminars To unsubscribe, visit
>> the List Server section of OSR Online at
>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer ****
>>
>> —
>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>>
>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>>
>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>>
>
> —
> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>
> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>
> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer

Find a machine that does have email capability and send the feedback from there, or find the doc page on MSDN and send feedback from there from a machine with email capability.

  • S (Msft)

-----Original Message-----
From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com [mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of xxxxx@flounder.com
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 5:22 PM
To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
Subject: Re: [windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG

The problem is that the “send feedback” link, at least the last time I clicked on one, wanted to send email. I have ten machines here, and only two of them have email capability. Neither of these machines are my development machine, where I read the documentation.

There are many unfortunate assumptions Microsoft makes, and one of them is that every machine has email connectivity.
joe

Yeah, I will have to start doing this… Let’s see.

On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Skywing
wrote:
>
>> Use the ?Send Feedback? link conveniently placed on every doc page
>> in these circumstances (otherwise the chances are slim to none that
>> the documentation will change on its own based on unvoiced
>> feedback).
>>
>>
**
>>
>> - S (Msft)

>>
>> ****
>>
>> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com [mailto:
>> xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Prokash Sinha
>> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 8:10 AM
>> To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
>> Subject: Re: [windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG
>>
>>
**
>>
>> This is where the Black Art resides :slight_smile:

>>
>> ****
>>
>> I usually look at the windbg help, then fire .chain then look at the
>> helps related to those extension commands. Finally the blogs (
>> including Urs :).
>>
>>

>>
>> But docs fail very short of what one would like to see. Dang I
>> thought it is a piler and it is working as a wrench.

>>
>> ****
>>
>> As a TA, I once had to tell a student, Your answers to these
>> probability questions themselves are probabilities - now I think
>> about them, applies to myself and smile…
>>
>>

>>
>> -pro

>>
>> ****
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Scott Noone
>> wrote:

>>
>> For completeness, !thread also supports flag 0x10 (which is the
>> important one for including user mode state). Both of these are
>> explained in the article for the curious.

>>
>>
>>
>> -scott
>>
>> –
>> Scott Noone
>> Consulting Associate and Chief System Problem Analyst OSR Open
>> Systems Resources, Inc.
>> http://www.osronline.com
>>
>> “Skywing” wrote in message news:xxxxx@windbg…

>>
>>
>>
>> You can use “!process 1f” as a shorthand, to dump all of
>> the threads out while using the PTEs of that process.
>>
>> Note that if the data was paged out then there’s nothing you can
>> really do here.
>>
>> - S (Msft)
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com [mailto:
>> xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of
>> xxxxx@comcast.net
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 4:12 PM
>> To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
>> Subject: RE:[windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG
**
>>
>> Thank You Tim! and lucky for me I took an Entire Memory Dump. While I
>> was poking around in the registry I decided it would be a good idea
>> to manually enable that. So what I should be looking for is how to
>> follow stacks going from ring 0 to ring 3 (for example) ?
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> -JC
>>
>> —
>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>>
>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>>
>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>>
>> —
>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>>
>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>>
>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> — WINDBG is sponsored by OSR For our schedule of WDF, WDM,
>> debugging and other seminars visit: http://www.osr.com/seminars To
>> unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer ****
>>
>> —
>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>>
>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>>
>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>>
>
> —
> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>
> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>
> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer


WINDBG is sponsored by OSR

For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
http://www.osr.com/seminars

To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer

What would you suggest they do instead?

mm

-----Original Message-----
From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of
xxxxx@flounder.com
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 5:22 PM
To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
Subject: Re: [windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG

The problem is that the “send feedback” link, at least the last time I
clicked on one, wanted to send email. I have ten machines here, and only
two of them have email capability. Neither of these machines are my
development machine, where I read the documentation.

There are many unfortunate assumptions Microsoft makes, and one of them is
that every machine has email connectivity.
joe

Yeah, I will have to start doing this… Let’s see.

On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Skywing
wrote:
>
>> Use the ‘Send Feedback’ link conveniently placed on every doc page
>> in these circumstances (otherwise the chances are slim to none that
>> the documentation will change on its own based on unvoiced
>> feedback).
>>
>>
**
>>
>> - S (Msft)

>>
>> ****
>>
>> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com [mailto:
>> xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Prokash Sinha
>> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 8:10 AM
>> To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
>> Subject: Re: [windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG
>>
>>
**
>>
>> This is where the Black Art resides :slight_smile:

>>
>> ****
>>
>> I usually look at the windbg help, then fire .chain then look at the
>> helps related to those extension commands. Finally the blogs (
>> including Urs :).
>>
>>

>>
>> But docs fail very short of what one would like to see. Dang I
>> thought it is a piler and it is working as a wrench.

>>
>> ****
>>
>> As a TA, I once had to tell a student, Your answers to these
>> probability questions themselves are probabilities - now I think
>> about them, applies to myself and smile…
>>
>>

>>
>> -pro

>>
>> ****
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Scott Noone
>> wrote:

>>
>> For completeness, !thread also supports flag 0x10 (which is the
>> important one for including user mode state). Both of these are
>> explained in the article for the curious.

>>
>>
>>
>> -scott
>>
>> –
>> Scott Noone
>> Consulting Associate and Chief System Problem Analyst OSR Open
>> Systems Resources, Inc.
>> http://www.osronline.com
>>
>> “Skywing” wrote in message news:xxxxx@windbg…

>>
>>
>>
>> You can use “!process 1f” as a shorthand, to dump all of
>> the threads out while using the PTEs of that process.
>>
>> Note that if the data was paged out then there’s nothing you can
>> really do here.
>>
>> - S (Msft)
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com [mailto:
>> xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of
>> xxxxx@comcast.net
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 4:12 PM
>> To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
>> Subject: RE:[windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG
**
>>
>> Thank You Tim! and lucky for me I took an Entire Memory Dump. While I
>> was poking around in the registry I decided it would be a good idea
>> to manually enable that. So what I should be looking for is how to
>> follow stacks going from ring 0 to ring 3 (for example) ?
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> -JC
>>
>> —
>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>>
>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>>
>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>>
>> —
>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>>
>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>>
>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> — WINDBG is sponsored by OSR For our schedule of WDF, WDM,
>> debugging and other seminars visit: http://www.osr.com/seminars To
>> unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer ****
>>
>> —
>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>>
>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>>
>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>>
>
> —
> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>
> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>
> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer


WINDBG is sponsored by OSR

For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
http://www.osr.com/seminars

To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer

The machine that has email has no documents, no development system, and
can’t access them because it is on the wrong side of the hardware
firewall.
joe

Find a machine that does have email capability and send the feedback from
there, or find the doc page on MSDN and send feedback from there from a
machine with email capability.

  • S (Msft)

-----Original Message-----
From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of
xxxxx@flounder.com
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 5:22 PM
To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
Subject: Re: [windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG

The problem is that the “send feedback” link, at least the last time I
clicked on one, wanted to send email. I have ten machines here, and only
two of them have email capability. Neither of these machines are my
development machine, where I read the documentation.

There are many unfortunate assumptions Microsoft makes, and one of them is
that every machine has email connectivity.
joe

> Yeah, I will have to start doing this… Let’s see.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Skywing
> wrote:
>>
>>> Use the ‘Send Feedback’ link conveniently placed on every doc page
>>> in these circumstances (otherwise the chances are slim to none that
>>> the documentation will change on its own based on unvoiced
>>> feedback).
>>>
>>>
**
>>>
>>> - S (Msft)

>>>
>>> ****
>>>
>>> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com [mailto:
>>> xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Prokash Sinha
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 8:10 AM
>>> To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
>>> Subject: Re: [windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG
>>>
>>>
**
>>>
>>> This is where the Black Art resides :slight_smile:

>>>
>>> ****
>>>
>>> I usually look at the windbg help, then fire .chain then look at the
>>> helps related to those extension commands. Finally the blogs (
>>> including Urs :).
>>>
>>>

>>>
>>> But docs fail very short of what one would like to see. Dang I
>>> thought it is a piler and it is working as a wrench.

>>>
>>> ****
>>>
>>> As a TA, I once had to tell a student, Your answers to these
>>> probability questions themselves are probabilities - now I think
>>> about them, applies to myself and smile…
>>>
>>>

>>>
>>> -pro

>>>
>>> ****
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Scott Noone
>>> wrote:

>>>
>>> For completeness, !thread also supports flag 0x10 (which is the
>>> important one for including user mode state). Both of these are
>>> explained in the article for the curious.

>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -scott
>>>
>>> –
>>> Scott Noone
>>> Consulting Associate and Chief System Problem Analyst OSR Open
>>> Systems Resources, Inc.
>>> http://www.osronline.com
>>>
>>> “Skywing” wrote in message news:xxxxx@windbg…

>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You can use “!process 1f” as a shorthand, to dump all of
>>> the threads out while using the PTEs of that process.
>>>
>>> Note that if the data was paged out then there’s nothing you can
>>> really do here.
>>>
>>> - S (Msft)
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com [mailto:
>>> xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of
>>> xxxxx@comcast.net
>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 4:12 PM
>>> To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
>>> Subject: RE:[windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG
**
>>>
>>> Thank You Tim! and lucky for me I took an Entire Memory Dump. While I
>>> was poking around in the registry I decided it would be a good idea
>>> to manually enable that. So what I should be looking for is how to
>>> follow stacks going from ring 0 to ring 3 (for example) ?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>
>>> -JC
>>>
>>> —
>>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>>>
>>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
>>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>>>
>>> —
>>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>>>
>>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
>>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer****
>>>
>>> ****
>>>
>>> — WINDBG is sponsored by OSR For our schedule of WDF, WDM,
>>> debugging and other seminars visit: http://www.osr.com/seminars To
>>> unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer ****
>>>
>>> —
>>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>>>
>>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
>>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>>>
>>
>> —
>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>>
>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>>
>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>
>
>
> —
> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>
> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>
> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>
> —
> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>
> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>
> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>

Include an email address that is visible to the reader.
joe

What would you suggest they do instead?

mm

-----Original Message-----
From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of
xxxxx@flounder.com
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 5:22 PM
To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
Subject: Re: [windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG

The problem is that the “send feedback” link, at least the last time I
clicked on one, wanted to send email. I have ten machines here, and only
two of them have email capability. Neither of these machines are my
development machine, where I read the documentation.

There are many unfortunate assumptions Microsoft makes, and one of them is
that every machine has email connectivity.
joe

> Yeah, I will have to start doing this… Let’s see.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Skywing
> wrote:
>>
>>> Use the ‘Send Feedback’ link conveniently placed on every doc page
>>> in these circumstances (otherwise the chances are slim to none that
>>> the documentation will change on its own based on unvoiced
>>> feedback).
>>>
>>>
**
>>>
>>> - S (Msft)

>>>
>>> ****
>>>
>>> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com [mailto:
>>> xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Prokash Sinha
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 8:10 AM
>>> To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
>>> Subject: Re: [windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG
>>>
>>>
**
>>>
>>> This is where the Black Art resides :slight_smile:

>>>
>>> ****
>>>
>>> I usually look at the windbg help, then fire .chain then look at the
>>> helps related to those extension commands. Finally the blogs (
>>> including Urs :).
>>>
>>>

>>>
>>> But docs fail very short of what one would like to see. Dang I
>>> thought it is a piler and it is working as a wrench.

>>>
>>> ****
>>>
>>> As a TA, I once had to tell a student, Your answers to these
>>> probability questions themselves are probabilities - now I think
>>> about them, applies to myself and smile…
>>>
>>>

>>>
>>> -pro

>>>
>>> ****
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Scott Noone
>>> wrote:

>>>
>>> For completeness, !thread also supports flag 0x10 (which is the
>>> important one for including user mode state). Both of these are
>>> explained in the article for the curious.

>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -scott
>>>
>>> –
>>> Scott Noone
>>> Consulting Associate and Chief System Problem Analyst OSR Open
>>> Systems Resources, Inc.
>>> http://www.osronline.com
>>>
>>> “Skywing” wrote in message news:xxxxx@windbg…

>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You can use “!process 1f” as a shorthand, to dump all of
>>> the threads out while using the PTEs of that process.
>>>
>>> Note that if the data was paged out then there’s nothing you can
>>> really do here.
>>>
>>> - S (Msft)
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com [mailto:
>>> xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of
>>> xxxxx@comcast.net
>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 4:12 PM
>>> To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
>>> Subject: RE:[windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG
**
>>>
>>> Thank You Tim! and lucky for me I took an Entire Memory Dump. While I
>>> was poking around in the registry I decided it would be a good idea
>>> to manually enable that. So what I should be looking for is how to
>>> follow stacks going from ring 0 to ring 3 (for example) ?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>
>>> -JC
>>>
>>> —
>>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>>>
>>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
>>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>>>
>>> —
>>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>>>
>>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
>>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer****
>>>
>>> ****
>>>
>>> — WINDBG is sponsored by OSR For our schedule of WDF, WDM,
>>> debugging and other seminars visit: http://www.osr.com/seminars To
>>> unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer ****
>>>
>>> —
>>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>>>
>>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
>>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>>>
>>
>> —
>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>>
>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>>
>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>
>
>
> —
> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>
> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>
> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>
>
> —
> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>
> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>
> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>

Ah, my bad - I missed that part. I thought you wanted them to use some
other form of communication.

mm

-----Original Message-----
From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of
xxxxx@flounder.com
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 6:10 PM
To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
Subject: RE: [windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG

Include an email address that is visible to the reader.
joe

What would you suggest they do instead?

mm

-----Original Message-----
From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of
xxxxx@flounder.com
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 5:22 PM
To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
Subject: Re: [windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG

The problem is that the “send feedback” link, at least the last time I
clicked on one, wanted to send email. I have ten machines here, and
only two of them have email capability. Neither of these machines are
my development machine, where I read the documentation.

There are many unfortunate assumptions Microsoft makes, and one of
them is that every machine has email connectivity.
joe

> Yeah, I will have to start doing this… Let’s see.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Skywing
> wrote:
>>
>>> Use the ‘Send Feedback’ link conveniently placed on every doc page
>>> in these circumstances (otherwise the chances are slim to none that
>>> the documentation will change on its own based on unvoiced
>>> feedback).
>>>
>>>
**
>>>
>>> - S (Msft)

>>>
>>> ****
>>>
>>> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com [mailto:
>>> xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Prokash Sinha
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 8:10 AM
>>> To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
>>> Subject: Re: [windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG
>>>
>>>
**
>>>
>>> This is where the Black Art resides :slight_smile:

>>>
>>> ****
>>>
>>> I usually look at the windbg help, then fire .chain then look at
>>> the helps related to those extension commands. Finally the blogs (
>>> including Urs :).
>>>
>>>

>>>
>>> But docs fail very short of what one would like to see. Dang I
>>> thought it is a piler and it is working as a wrench.

>>>
>>> ****
>>>
>>> As a TA, I once had to tell a student, Your answers to these
>>> probability questions themselves are probabilities - now I think
>>> about them, applies to myself and smile…
>>>
>>>

>>>
>>> -pro

>>>
>>> ****
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Scott Noone
>>> wrote:

>>>
>>> For completeness, !thread also supports flag 0x10 (which is the
>>> important one for including user mode state). Both of these are
>>> explained in the article for the curious.

>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -scott
>>>
>>> –
>>> Scott Noone
>>> Consulting Associate and Chief System Problem Analyst OSR Open
>>> Systems Resources, Inc.
>>> http://www.osronline.com
>>>
>>> “Skywing” wrote in message news:xxxxx@windbg…

>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You can use “!process 1f” as a shorthand, to dump all of
>>> the threads out while using the PTEs of that process.
>>>
>>> Note that if the data was paged out then there’s nothing you can
>>> really do here.
>>>
>>> - S (Msft)
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com [mailto:
>>> xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of
>>> xxxxx@comcast.net
>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 4:12 PM
>>> To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
>>> Subject: RE:[windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG
**
>>>
>>> Thank You Tim! and lucky for me I took an Entire Memory Dump. While
>>> I was poking around in the registry I decided it would be a good
>>> idea to manually enable that. So what I should be looking for is how
>>> to follow stacks going from ring 0 to ring 3 (for example) ?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>
>>> -JC
>>>
>>> —
>>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>>>
>>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
>>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>>>
>>> —
>>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>>>
>>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
>>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer****
>>>
>>> ****
>>>
>>> — WINDBG is sponsored by OSR For our schedule of WDF, WDM,
>>> debugging and other seminars visit: http://www.osr.com/seminars To
>>> unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer ****
>>>
>>> —
>>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>>>
>>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
>>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>>>
>>
>> —
>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>>
>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>>
>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>
>
>
> —
> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>
> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>
> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>
>
> —
> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>
> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>
> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>


WINDBG is sponsored by OSR

For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
http://www.osr.com/seminars

To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer

I still don’t understand. There’s only one email address for documentation
feedback, the link on the bottom is just a mailto that fills in the subject
so that doc writers/maintainers know what you’re talking about. If there was
*just* an email address on the bottom, they would have to put the onus on
the submitter to mention the doc page, date, source, etc. (in a standard
format, of course) when submitting the feedback. Though, if you really see
this as a problem and you prefer to do it that way, it doesn’t take much to
parse the mailto link and figure out what the email address is.

-scott


Scott Noone
Consulting Associate and Chief System Problem Analyst
OSR Open Systems Resources, Inc.
http://www.osronline.com

“Martin O’Brien” wrote in message news:xxxxx@windbg…

Ah, my bad - I missed that part. I thought you wanted them to use some
other form of communication.

mm

-----Original Message-----
From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of
xxxxx@flounder.com
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 6:10 PM
To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
Subject: RE: [windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG

Include an email address that is visible to the reader.
joe

What would you suggest they do instead?

mm

-----Original Message-----
From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of
xxxxx@flounder.com
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 5:22 PM
To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
Subject: Re: [windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG

The problem is that the “send feedback” link, at least the last time I
clicked on one, wanted to send email. I have ten machines here, and
only two of them have email capability. Neither of these machines are
my development machine, where I read the documentation.

There are many unfortunate assumptions Microsoft makes, and one of
them is that every machine has email connectivity.
joe

> Yeah, I will have to start doing this… Let’s see.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Skywing
> wrote:
>>
>>> Use the ‘Send Feedback’ link conveniently placed on every doc page
>>> in these circumstances (otherwise the chances are slim to none that
>>> the documentation will change on its own based on unvoiced
>>> feedback).
>>>
>>>
**
>>>
>>> - S (Msft)

>>>
>>> ****
>>>
>>> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com [mailto:
>>> xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Prokash Sinha
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 8:10 AM
>>> To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
>>> Subject: Re: [windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG
>>>
>>>
**
>>>
>>> This is where the Black Art resides :slight_smile:

>>>
>>> ****
>>>
>>> I usually look at the windbg help, then fire .chain then look at
>>> the helps related to those extension commands. Finally the blogs (
>>> including Urs :).
>>>
>>>

>>>
>>> But docs fail very short of what one would like to see. Dang I
>>> thought it is a piler and it is working as a wrench.

>>>
>>> ****
>>>
>>> As a TA, I once had to tell a student, Your answers to these
>>> probability questions themselves are probabilities - now I think
>>> about them, applies to myself and smile…
>>>
>>>

>>>
>>> -pro

>>>
>>> ****
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Scott Noone
>>> wrote:

>>>
>>> For completeness, !thread also supports flag 0x10 (which is the
>>> important one for including user mode state). Both of these are
>>> explained in the article for the curious.

>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -scott
>>>
>>> –
>>> Scott Noone
>>> Consulting Associate and Chief System Problem Analyst OSR Open
>>> Systems Resources, Inc.
>>> http://www.osronline.com
>>>
>>> “Skywing” wrote in message news:xxxxx@windbg…

>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You can use “!process 1f” as a shorthand, to dump all of
>>> the threads out while using the PTEs of that process.
>>>
>>> Note that if the data was paged out then there’s nothing you can
>>> really do here.
>>>
>>> - S (Msft)
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com [mailto:
>>> xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of
>>> xxxxx@comcast.net
>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 4:12 PM
>>> To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
>>> Subject: RE:[windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG
**
>>>
>>> Thank You Tim! and lucky for me I took an Entire Memory Dump. While
>>> I was poking around in the registry I decided it would be a good
>>> idea to manually enable that. So what I should be looking for is how
>>> to follow stacks going from ring 0 to ring 3 (for example) ?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>
>>> -JC
>>>
>>> —
>>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>>>
>>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
>>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>>>
>>> —
>>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>>>
>>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
>>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer****
>>>
>>> ****
>>>
>>> — WINDBG is sponsored by OSR For our schedule of WDF, WDM,
>>> debugging and other seminars visit: http://www.osr.com/seminars To
>>> unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer ****
>>>
>>> —
>>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>>>
>>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
>>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>>>
>>
>> —
>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>>
>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>>
>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>
>
>
> —
> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>
> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>
> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>
>
> —
> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>
> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>
> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>


WINDBG is sponsored by OSR

For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
http://www.osr.com/seminars

To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer

Clicking a mailto: requires that there be an email system installed on my
machine, which there often isn’t, and that (in the one machine that still
has Outlook Express) that the email is configured to actually be usable.

Since I keep my documentation on my right-hand montitor, I can switch the
left-hand monitor to the email machine, and type in anything I want.

To me, the idea that I am assumed to have a machine configured like the
one at the developer’s desktop is bizarre in the extreme, and I don’t
bother going through the extra steps to view the source and find the link.
It isn’t worth my time.
joe

I still don’t understand. There’s only one email address for documentation
feedback, the link on the bottom is just a mailto that fills in the
subject
so that doc writers/maintainers know what you’re talking about. If there
was
*just* an email address on the bottom, they would have to put the onus on
the submitter to mention the doc page, date, source, etc. (in a standard
format, of course) when submitting the feedback. Though, if you really see
this as a problem and you prefer to do it that way, it doesn’t take much
to
parse the mailto link and figure out what the email address is.

-scott


Scott Noone
Consulting Associate and Chief System Problem Analyst
OSR Open Systems Resources, Inc.
http://www.osronline.com

“Martin O’Brien” wrote in message news:xxxxx@windbg…

Ah, my bad - I missed that part. I thought you wanted them to use some
other form of communication.

mm

-----Original Message-----
From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of
xxxxx@flounder.com
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 6:10 PM
To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
Subject: RE: [windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG

Include an email address that is visible to the reader.
joe

> What would you suggest they do instead?
>
>
>
> mm
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
> [mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of
> xxxxx@flounder.com
> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 5:22 PM
> To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
> Subject: Re: [windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG
>
> The problem is that the “send feedback” link, at least the last time I
> clicked on one, wanted to send email. I have ten machines here, and
> only two of them have email capability. Neither of these machines are
> my development machine, where I read the documentation.
>
> There are many unfortunate assumptions Microsoft makes, and one of
> them is that every machine has email connectivity.
> joe
>
>
>
>> Yeah, I will have to start doing this… Let’s see.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Skywing
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Use the ‘Send Feedback’ link conveniently placed on every doc page
>>>> in these circumstances (otherwise the chances are slim to none that
>>>> the documentation will change on its own based on unvoiced
>>>> feedback).
>>>>
>>>>
**
>>>>
>>>> - S (Msft)

>>>>
>>>> ****
>>>>
>>>> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com [mailto:
>>>> xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Prokash Sinha
>>>> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 8:10 AM
>>>> To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
>>>> Subject: Re: [windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG
>>>>
>>>>
**
>>>>
>>>> This is where the Black Art resides :slight_smile:

>>>>
>>>> ****
>>>>
>>>> I usually look at the windbg help, then fire .chain then look at
>>>> the helps related to those extension commands. Finally the blogs (
>>>> including Urs :).
>>>>
>>>>

>>>>
>>>> But docs fail very short of what one would like to see. Dang I
>>>> thought it is a piler and it is working as a wrench.

>>>>
>>>> ****
>>>>
>>>> As a TA, I once had to tell a student, Your answers to these
>>>> probability questions themselves are probabilities - now I think
>>>> about them, applies to myself and smile…
>>>>
>>>>

>>>>
>>>> -pro

>>>>
>>>> ****
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Scott Noone
>>>> wrote:

>>>>
>>>> For completeness, !thread also supports flag 0x10 (which is the
>>>> important one for including user mode state). Both of these are
>>>> explained in the article for the curious.

>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -scott
>>>>
>>>> –
>>>> Scott Noone
>>>> Consulting Associate and Chief System Problem Analyst OSR Open
>>>> Systems Resources, Inc.
>>>> http://www.osronline.com
>>>>
>>>> “Skywing” wrote in message news:xxxxx@windbg…

>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You can use “!process 1f” as a shorthand, to dump all of
>>>> the threads out while using the PTEs of that process.
>>>>
>>>> Note that if the data was paged out then there’s nothing you can
>>>> really do here.
>>>>
>>>> - S (Msft)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com [mailto:
>>>> xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of
>>>> xxxxx@comcast.net
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 4:12 PM
>>>> To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
>>>> Subject: RE:[windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG
**
>>>>
>>>> Thank You Tim! and lucky for me I took an Entire Memory Dump. While
>>>> I was poking around in the registry I decided it would be a good
>>>> idea to manually enable that. So what I should be looking for is how
>>>> to follow stacks going from ring 0 to ring 3 (for example) ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>>
>>>> -JC
>>>>
>>>> —
>>>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>>>>
>>>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
>>>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>>>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>>>>
>>>> —
>>>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>>>>
>>>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
>>>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>>>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer****
>>>>
>>>> ****
>>>>
>>>> — WINDBG is sponsored by OSR For our schedule of WDF, WDM,
>>>> debugging and other seminars visit: http://www.osr.com/seminars To
>>>> unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>>>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer ****
>>>>
>>>> —
>>>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>>>>
>>>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
>>>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>>>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>>>>
>>>
>>> —
>>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>>>
>>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
>>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>>
>>
>>
>> —
>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>>
>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>>
>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>>
>>
>> —
>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>>
>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>>
>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>>
>
>
>
> —
> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>
> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>
> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>
>
> —
> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>
> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>
> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>

I agree that it wouldn’t hurt to have the actual feedback address printed
somewhere, but I’m not sure that this is quite the outrage that you think
it is.

I mean, if I were to make a list of the problems with the windbg docs and
why it’s not worth the time to submit feedback, personally, I would start
with that the docs do not appear to have been touched in years (I know they
weren’t for several years; may not be true anymore).

Mm
On Apr 20, 2012 7:25 PM, wrote:

> Clicking a mailto: requires that there be an email system installed on my
> machine, which there often isn’t, and that (in the one machine that still
> has Outlook Express) that the email is configured to actually be usable.
>
> Since I keep my documentation on my right-hand montitor, I can switch the
> left-hand monitor to the email machine, and type in anything I want.
>
> To me, the idea that I am assumed to have a machine configured like the
> one at the developer’s desktop is bizarre in the extreme, and I don’t
> bother going through the extra steps to view the source and find the link.
> It isn’t worth my time.
> joe
>
>
> > I still don’t understand. There’s only one email address for
> documentation
> > feedback, the link on the bottom is just a mailto that fills in the
> > subject
> > so that doc writers/maintainers know what you’re talking about. If there
> > was
> > just an email address on the bottom, they would have to put the onus on
> > the submitter to mention the doc page, date, source, etc. (in a standard
> > format, of course) when submitting the feedback. Though, if you really
> see
> > this as a problem and you prefer to do it that way, it doesn’t take much
> > to
> > parse the mailto link and figure out what the email address is.
> >
> > -scott
> >
> > –
> > Scott Noone
> > Consulting Associate and Chief System Problem Analyst
> > OSR Open Systems Resources, Inc.
> > http://www.osronline.com
> >
> > “Martin O’Brien” wrote in message news:xxxxx@windbg…
> >
> > Ah, my bad - I missed that part. I thought you wanted them to use some
> > other form of communication.
> >
> > mm
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
> > [mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of
> > xxxxx@flounder.com
> > Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 6:10 PM
> > To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
> > Subject: RE: [windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG
> >
> > Include an email address that is visible to the reader.
> > joe
> >
> >> What would you suggest they do instead?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> mm
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
> >> [mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of
> >> xxxxx@flounder.com
> >> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 5:22 PM
> >> To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
> >> Subject: Re: [windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG
> >>
> >> The problem is that the “send feedback” link, at least the last time I
> >> clicked on one, wanted to send email. I have ten machines here, and
> >> only two of them have email capability. Neither of these machines are
> >> my development machine, where I read the documentation.
> >>
> >> There are many unfortunate assumptions Microsoft makes, and one of
> >> them is that every machine has email connectivity.
> >> joe
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> Yeah, I will have to start doing this… Let’s see.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Skywing
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Use the ‘Send Feedback’ link conveniently placed on every doc page
> >>>> in these circumstances (otherwise the chances are slim to none that
> >>>> the documentation will change on its own based on unvoiced
> >>>> feedback).
> >>>>
> >>>>
**
> >>>>
> >>>> - S (Msft)

> >>>>
> >>>> ****
> >>>>
> >>>> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com [mailto:
> >>>> xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Prokash Sinha
> >>>> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 8:10 AM
> >>>> To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
> >>>> Subject: Re: [windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG
> >>>>
> >>>>
**
> >>>>
> >>>> This is where the Black Art resides :slight_smile:

> >>>>
> >>>> ****
> >>>>
> >>>> I usually look at the windbg help, then fire .chain then look at
> >>>> the helps related to those extension commands. Finally the blogs (
> >>>> including Urs :).
> >>>>
> >>>>

> >>>>
> >>>> But docs fail very short of what one would like to see. Dang I
> >>>> thought it is a piler and it is working as a wrench.

> >>>>
> >>>> ****
> >>>>
> >>>> As a TA, I once had to tell a student, Your answers to these
> >>>> probability questions themselves are probabilities - now I think
> >>>> about them, applies to myself and smile…
> >>>>
> >>>>

> >>>>
> >>>> -pro

> >>>>
> >>>> ****
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Scott Noone
> >>>> wrote:

> >>>>
> >>>> For completeness, !thread also supports flag 0x10 (which is the
> >>>> important one for including user mode state). Both of these are
> >>>> explained in the article for the curious.

> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -scott
> >>>>
> >>>> –
> >>>> Scott Noone
> >>>> Consulting Associate and Chief System Problem Analyst OSR Open
> >>>> Systems Resources, Inc.
> >>>> http://www.osronline.com
> >>>>
> >>>> “Skywing” wrote in message news:xxxxx@windbg…

> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> You can use “!process 1f” as a shorthand, to dump all of
> >>>> the threads out while using the PTEs of that process.
> >>>>
> >>>> Note that if the data was paged out then there’s nothing you can
> >>>> really do here.
> >>>>
> >>>> - S (Msft)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com [mailto:
> >>>> xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of
> >>>> xxxxx@comcast.net
> >>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 4:12 PM
> >>>> To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
> >>>> Subject: RE:[windbg] strange stack outputs in WinDBG
**
> >>>>
> >>>> Thank You Tim! and lucky for me I took an Entire Memory Dump. While
> >>>> I was poking around in the registry I decided it would be a good
> >>>> idea to manually enable that. So what I should be looking for is how
> >>>> to follow stacks going from ring 0 to ring 3 (for example) ?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks in advance,
> >>>>
> >>>> -JC
> >>>>
> >>>> —
> >>>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
> >>>>
> >>>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
> >>>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
> >>>>
> >>>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> >>>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
> >>>>
> >>>> —
> >>>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
> >>>>
> >>>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
> >>>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
> >>>>
> >>>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> >>>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer****
> >>>>
> >>>> ****
> >>>>
> >>>> — WINDBG is sponsored by OSR For our schedule of WDF, WDM,
> >>>> debugging and other seminars visit: http://www.osr.com/seminars To
> >>>> unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> >>>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer ****
> >>>>
> >>>> —
> >>>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
> >>>>
> >>>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
> >>>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
> >>>>
> >>>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> >>>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> —
> >>> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
> >>>
> >>> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
> >>> http://www.osr.com/seminars
> >>>
> >>> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> >>> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> —
> >> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
> >>
> >> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
> >> http://www.osr.com/seminars
> >>
> >> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> >> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
> >>
> >>
> >> —
> >> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
> >>
> >> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
> >> http://www.osr.com/seminars
> >>
> >> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> >> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > —
> > WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
> >
> > For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
> > http://www.osr.com/seminars
> >
> > To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> > http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
> >
> >
> > —
> > WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
> >
> > For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
> > http://www.osr.com/seminars
> >
> > To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> > http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
> >
>
>
>
> —
> WINDBG is sponsored by OSR
>
> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>
> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>