RE: windbg digest: January 12, 2006

Drew:

Thank you for the information.

I am wondering what is the step to make a retail version of PDB to
contain the index information and make it Indexable.

kathy

-----Original Message-----
From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Kernel Debugging
Interest List digest
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 9:00 PM
To: windbg digest recipients
Subject: windbg digest: January 12, 2006

WINDBG Digest for Thursday, January 12, 2006.

  1. Verifier message in windbg
  2. Re: Verifier message in windbg
  3. source server
  4. RE: source server
  5. Re: Verifier message in windbg

Subject: Verifier message in windbg
From: “jim”
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:07:19 -0500
X-Message-Number: 1

Just curious what the purpose of this is:

*************************************************************


This is the string you add to your checkin description
Driver Verifier: Enabled for szkg.sys on Build 2600
B7bh27kvj0KPcvdZskuquD

*************************************************************


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: Verifier message in windbg
From: Tim Roberts
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:29:25 -0800
X-Message-Number: 2

jim wrote:

>Just curious what the purpose of this is:
>
> ***************************************************************

>

>
This is the string you add to your checkin description
>
Driver Verifier: Enabled for szkg.sys on Build 2600
B7bh27kvj0KPcvdZskuquD
>

> ***************************************************************

>
>

When you submit a driver to WHQL for logo testing, you’re supposed to
provide this string as some kind of proof that you actually ran with
driver verifier on. At least, that’s the theory.


Tim Roberts, xxxxx@probo.com
Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: source server
From: “Kathy Pu”
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:30:48 -0800
X-Message-Number: 3

Hi All,

Does anyone ever make the source server working on the RETAIL version of
PDB files?

It seems that the source index only works on the DEBUG version of PDB
file, but not the retail version.

Any input is welcomed.

kathy

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: RE: source server
From: “Drew Bliss”
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:15:58 -0800
X-Message-Number: 4

By “retail” PDB do you mean a full PDB produced from a retail build or
the public PDB produced by stripping a full PDB? A public PDB does not
have source info of any kind.

In the debugger’s eyes a PDB from a retail build is no different than a
PDB from a debug build, and as long as your build runs the source
indexer to put the source info in the PDB it will work. You can see if
the PDB has source server info with !lmi . If it says “not
source indexed” the PDB does not contain source server info.

________________________________

From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Kathy Pu
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 9:31 AM
To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
Subject: [windbg] source server

Hi All,

Does anyone ever make the source server working on the RETAIL version of
PDB files?

It seems that the source index only works on the DEBUG version of PDB
file, but not the retail version.

Any input is welcomed.

kathy


You are currently subscribed to windbg as: unknown lmsubst tag argument:
‘’
To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: Verifier message in windbg
From: “jim”
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:19:40 -0500
X-Message-Number: 5

Thanks.
I’ll be sure to ignore it :slight_smile:

“Tim Roberts” wrote in message news:xxxxx@windbg…
> jim wrote:
>
>>Just curious what the purpose of this is:
>>
>> *********************************************************

>>

>>
This is the string you add to your checkin description
>>
Driver Verifier: Enabled for szkg.sys on Build 2600
>>B7bh27kvj0KPcvdZskuquD
>>

>> *************************************************************

>>
>>
>
> When you submit a driver to WHQL for logo testing, you’re supposed to
> provide this string as some kind of proof that you actually ran with
> driver verifier on. At least, that’s the theory.
>
> –
> Tim Roberts, xxxxx@probo.com
> Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.
>
>
>



END OF DIGEST


You are currently subscribed to windbg as: xxxxx@attunesystems.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com

You need to run the source server indexing tool. The source server
documentation covers how that is done.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kathy Pu [mailto:xxxxx@attunesystems.com]
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 11:47 AM
To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
Cc: Drew Bliss
Subject: RE: windbg digest: January 12, 2006

Drew:

Thank you for the information.

I am wondering what is the step to make a retail version of PDB to
contain the index information and make it Indexable.

kathy

-----Original Message-----
From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Kernel Debugging
Interest List digest
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 9:00 PM
To: windbg digest recipients
Subject: windbg digest: January 12, 2006

WINDBG Digest for Thursday, January 12, 2006.

  1. Verifier message in windbg
  2. Re: Verifier message in windbg
  3. source server
  4. RE: source server
  5. Re: Verifier message in windbg

Subject: Verifier message in windbg
From: “jim”
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:07:19 -0500
X-Message-Number: 1

Just curious what the purpose of this is:

*************************************************************


This is the string you add to your checkin description
Driver Verifier: Enabled for szkg.sys on Build 2600
B7bh27kvj0KPcvdZskuquD

*************************************************************


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: Verifier message in windbg
From: Tim Roberts
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:29:25 -0800
X-Message-Number: 2

jim wrote:

>Just curious what the purpose of this is:
>
> ***************************************************************

>

>
This is the string you add to your checkin description
>
Driver Verifier: Enabled for szkg.sys on Build 2600
B7bh27kvj0KPcvdZskuquD
>

> ***************************************************************

>
>

When you submit a driver to WHQL for logo testing, you’re supposed to
provide this string as some kind of proof that you actually ran with
driver verifier on. At least, that’s the theory.


Tim Roberts, xxxxx@probo.com
Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: source server
From: “Kathy Pu”
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:30:48 -0800
X-Message-Number: 3

Hi All,

Does anyone ever make the source server working on the RETAIL version of
PDB files?

It seems that the source index only works on the DEBUG version of PDB
file, but not the retail version.

Any input is welcomed.

kathy

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: RE: source server
From: “Drew Bliss”
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:15:58 -0800
X-Message-Number: 4

By “retail” PDB do you mean a full PDB produced from a retail build or
the public PDB produced by stripping a full PDB? A public PDB does not
have source info of any kind.

In the debugger’s eyes a PDB from a retail build is no different than a
PDB from a debug build, and as long as your build runs the source
indexer to put the source info in the PDB it will work. You can see if
the PDB has source server info with !lmi . If it says “not
source indexed” the PDB does not contain source server info.

________________________________

From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Kathy Pu
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 9:31 AM
To: Kernel Debugging Interest List
Subject: [windbg] source server

Hi All,

Does anyone ever make the source server working on the RETAIL version of
PDB files?

It seems that the source index only works on the DEBUG version of PDB
file, but not the retail version.

Any input is welcomed.

kathy


You are currently subscribed to windbg as: unknown lmsubst tag argument:
‘’
To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: Verifier message in windbg
From: “jim”
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:19:40 -0500
X-Message-Number: 5

Thanks.
I’ll be sure to ignore it :slight_smile:

“Tim Roberts” wrote in message news:xxxxx@windbg…
> jim wrote:
>
>>Just curious what the purpose of this is:
>>
>> *********************************************************

>>

>>
This is the string you add to your checkin description
>>
Driver Verifier: Enabled for szkg.sys on Build 2600
>>B7bh27kvj0KPcvdZskuquD
>>

>> *************************************************************

>>
>>
>
> When you submit a driver to WHQL for logo testing, you’re supposed to
> provide this string as some kind of proof that you actually ran with
> driver verifier on. At least, that’s the theory.
>
> –
> Tim Roberts, xxxxx@probo.com
> Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.
>
>
>



END OF DIGEST


You are currently subscribed to windbg as: xxxxx@attunesystems.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com