Yes, it didn’t work for me.
Regards,
Bala
-----Original Message-----
From: Vodicka, Michal [mailto:michal.vodicka@st.com]
Posted At: 04 October 2002 06:40
Posted To: ntfsd
Conversation: [ntfsd] Re: Usage of
SeMarkLogonSessionForTerminationNotifica tion?
Subject: [ntfsd] Re: Usage of SeMarkLogonSessionForTerminationNotifica
tion?
From: xxxxx@storagecraft.com[SMTP:xxxxx@storagecraft.com]
Reply To: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 11:23 PM
To: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
Subject: [ntfsd] Re: Usage of
SeMarkLogonSessionForTerminationNotifica tion?> Correct but under my experience, it doesn’t always works as
expected. The
> callback is never called for the first GUI logon session and also
for some
> next if you’re using fast user switching. It seems there is some
problemIf this is really so, then this is a severe bug, which will, for
instance, break the SMB redir.
The redir will not be able to disconnect from servers on logoff in
this case.
Really? I’m not sure if I did everything correctly but remaining
reference
count for logon session was about 3 - 8. I’d really like to know others
experience with it; it is probable I will work on this project again
within
several months and would like to fix this problem some way. For sure I
had
the problem at XP Home and Professional with fast user switching
enabled.
Probably also under other configurations but I’m not quite sure, memory
leaks too quickly…
Thanks for any comment which could shed some light on the subject.
Best regards,
Michal Vodicka
STMicroelectronics Design and Application s.r.o.
[michal.vodicka@st.com, http:://www.st.com]
You are currently subscribed to ntfsd as: xxxxx@avantisworld.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%