RE: Can I presume the size of buffer of Paging IO is mult iple of 4K?

This does not square with my observations of behavior - I have seen smaller
paging I/O operations than 4KB, but never smaller than 512 bytes. A
non-cached I/O smaller than sector size isn’t really valid anyway.

Regards,

Tony

Tony Mason
Consulting Partner
OSR Open Systems Resources, Inc.
http://www.osr.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Cary Fu [mailto:xxxxx@authenex.com]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:08 PM
To: File Systems Developers
Subject: [ntfsd] Can I presume the size of buffer of Paging IO is multiple
of 4K?

Hi all,
I am developing a file system filter driver and it seems to work very
well in most cases. In my driver, I always presume the size of Read/Write
buffer size is multiple of 4K when paging IO. Is that right? If not, can I
force IO manager always creates
multiple of 4K buffer?

Thanks in advance.

Cary


You are currently subscribed to ntfsd as: xxxxx@osr.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com