> >If you want a tool that will get you 0-60 faster than your competition
>could ever
>even think of getting there, use a tool like WinDK.
I always thought it was appropriate to learn to drive BEFORE finding
yourself at the steering wheel of a potential lethal weapon going 60.
True, but you generally learn to drive in a car well capable of going 60.
yet-another-toolkit-vs.-no-toolkit debate…>
—
You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: $subst(‘Recip.EmailAddr’)
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-ntdev-$subst(‘Recip.MemberIDChar’)@lists.osr.com
Let me say this:
I have nothing against tool kits. Esp. if they are available with
source. My argument is against C++ OO development in a KM driver.
Drivers should be small and tight. I think we all agree with this; it
has been so forever in the “black magic” world of driver development.
So, I content that if you NEED to use C++ and OO in your driver, maybe
more time should be spent rethinking the architecture and design.
Jamey
-----Original Message-----
From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Jan Bottorff
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 7:38 AM
To: NT Developers Interest List
Subject: [ntdev] Re: 3rd party Device driver development tool or pure
wdm driver development…Which is the best???
If you want a tool that will get you 0-60 faster than your competition
could ever
even think of getting there, use a tool like WinDK.
I always thought it was appropriate to learn to drive BEFORE finding
yourself at the steering wheel of a potential lethal weapon going 60.
You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: xxxxx@storagecraft.com To
unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-ntdev-$subst(‘Recip.MemberIDChar’)@lists.osr.com
You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: $subst(‘Recip.EmailAddr’)
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-ntdev-$subst(‘Recip.MemberIDChar’)@lists.osr.com