Hello Tony,
Thanks a lot
–
Roman Kudinov
Friday, July 23, 2004, 2:05:42 PM, you wrote:
TM> Fast I/O read and write operate against the cache in all of the Windows
TM> file systems. A 3rd party file system could do something “tricky” here,
TM> I suppose, but in our implementations we obey this same rule - no
TM> caching, no fast I/O.
TM> Regards,
TM> Tony
TM> Tony Mason
TM> Consulting Partner
TM> OSR Open Systems Resources, Inc.
TM> http://www.osr.com
TM> -----Original Message-----
TM> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
TM> [mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Roman Kudinov
TM> Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 5:51 AM
TM> To: ntfsd redirect
TM> Subject: [ntfsd] Fast I/O &. IRP_MJ_xxx
TM> Hi,
TM> As it comes from OSR FAQ there is no description of Fast I/O calls and
TM> I just need to pass them through without any processing.
TM> However I need to block I/O operations which can modify information on
TM> disk on some conditions for a particular period of time. As I
TM> understand I can do it by handling regular IRP_MJ_xxx calls and doesn’t
TM> need to think about Fast I/O at all. Am I right?
TM> P.S.
TM> I’ve used FileMon and found that for every Fast I/O call, which is
TM> interesting for me a corresponding IRP_MJ_xx call is received by the
TM> filter, for example FileMon intercepts FASTIO_WRITE sent by the process
TM> and then IRP_MJ_WRITE sent by the system.
TM> Is it always true?
TM> –
TM> Roman
TM> —
TM> Questions? First check the IFS FAQ at
TM> https://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=17
TM> You are currently subscribed to ntfsd as: xxxxx@osr.com
TM> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
TM> xxxxx@lists.osr.com
TM> —
TM> Questions? First check the IFS FAQ at
TM> https://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=17
TM> You are currently subscribed to ntfsd as: xxxxx@rbcmail.ru
TM> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
TM> xxxxx@lists.osr.com