Dual Opteron motherboard?

> Except you will quickly find that many, many, INSTALLERS are actually

16-bit apps.

This is the consequence of Microsoft’s misdecision to not provide any MSI
generation tools with, say, PSDK or Visual Studio.

Very funny if the OS vendor creates the centralized installer technology and
does NOT provide any tools (even command-line build tools) to generate the
distros.

My final piece of advice, such as it is, is to be careful with systems
that have NVIDIA support chipsets, such as the NForce4. I’ve been
hoping to test some of these in our labs, but haven’t been able to yet.
I *am* aware of people have trouble with them in desktop systems.

Yes, and then people blame Athlon/Opteron and AMD for this chipset issues.

Maxim Shatskih, Windows DDK MVP
StorageCraft Corporation
xxxxx@storagecraft.com
http://www.storagecraft.com

Alberto,

sure but even there WinDbg works better :slight_smile: Sorry, I don’t want to discuss it here as I expressed my dissatisfaction with VSI UI several times during beta testing and finally gave up. I believe it has satisfied users, my needs are just different. And anyway, the main reason why I prefer SI is one computer debugging.

BTW, I have to use embedded debuggers sometimes and comparing with them both VSI and WinDbg are great, easy to use and rock stable :slight_smile:

Best regards,

Michal Vodicka
UPEK, Inc.
[xxxxx@upek.com, http://www.upek.com]


From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com[SMTP:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] on behalf of Alberto Moreira[SMTP:xxxxx@ieee.org]
Reply To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 2:43 PM
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Subject: Re: [ntdev] Dual Opteron motherboard?

Michal,

You can always stick to the Visual SoftICE command window. The
only thing is, it won’t show up in your monochrome monitor ;-).
But, you know, once you get the hang of it, the interface’s not
that bad; it’s like classical music, it grows on you the more
you use it.

Plus, if you already have DriverStudio, target installations are
free!

Alberto.

----- Original Message -----
From: “Michal Vodicka”
> To: “Windows System Software Devs Interest List”
>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 12:55 AM
> Subject: RE: [ntdev] Dual Opteron motherboard?
>
>
> Calvin,
>
> good to know ATI has 64-bit drivers. We plan to use X600 Pro. I
> understand switching wasn’t easy in early phase. Fortunately,
> our customers didn’t care too much so we could wait until other
> 64-bit drivers are available :wink: Yes, still it is necessary to
> check before.
>
> As for SoftICE, I meant using 32-bit “classic” version on 32-bit
> OS installed at dual Opteron. Theroretically it should work but
> better to ask, I’ll try Compuware. I don’t plan using 64-bit
> Visual SoftICE as user interface is horrible for me, even
> WindBag is better :wink:
>
> Best regards,
>
> Michal Vodicka
> UPEK, Inc.
> [xxxxx@upek.com, http://www.upek.com]
>
>
> > ----------
> > From:
> > xxxxx@lists.osr.com[SMTP:xxxxx@lists.osr.com]
> > on behalf of Calvin Guan[SMTP:xxxxx@yahoo.ca]
> > Reply To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 6:03 AM
> > To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
> > Subject: Re: [ntdev] Dual Opteron motherboard?
> >
> > Michal,
> >
> > SoftICE didn’t support any 64bit system until late
> > 2003 IIRC. We started developing 64-bit Radeon video
> > driver way before 64-bit S-ICE’s release, therefore, a
> > lot of S-ICE lovers had to switch to WindBag-:). Also
> > the driver support for amd64 and Itanium was awful.
> > Neither the onboard gigabit NIC has a 64-bit driver
> > nor did all other popular 10/100 nics. I had to build
> > my own 64-bit ndis driver to get my 3com905 online-:slight_smile:
> > That’s the story of victim of early 64-bit developers
> > a couple of years ago.
> >
> > Driver support is much better now, but still, as
> > Peter suggested, you’d better double check the
> > critical device such as video, network… I know all
> > recent ATi Radeon family adapters have decent 64-bit
> > drivers for amd and Itanium. Even the old Rage128/XL
> > (mainly on server platform) should work too. For nic,
> > I would recommend Broadcom’s NetXtreme gigabit nic and
> > Intel’s E1000.
> >
> >
> > Calvin Guan Windows DDK MVP
> > Enterprise Network Controller Engineering
> > Broadcom Corp. http://www.broadcom.com
> >
> > — Michal Vodicka wrote:
> > > We finally decided to make 64-bit versions of our
> > > drivers so I’d need a new development machine. It
> > > seems as dual Opteron is the best choice as I need>
> > > it for both 32 and 64-bit development and SMP is
> > > necessary. Now I’m trying to find complying
> > > motherboard. Has anybody an experience, good or bad,
> > > with Asus K8N-DL? Or any other mb which can be
> > > recommended or rejected?
> > >
> > > Also, I’d like to know how well it works in 32-bit
> > > mode. If I understand correctly, OS should work with
> > > no problem but what about special software as
> > > SoftICE and VMware? Any experiece?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Michal Vodicka
> > > UPEK, Inc.
> > > [xxxxx@upek.com, http://www.upek.com]
> > >
> > >
> > > —
> > > Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
> > > http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
> > >
> > > You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: unknown
> > > lmsubst tag argument: ‘’
> > > To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> > > xxxxx@lists.osr.com
> > >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
> >
> > —
> > Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
> > http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
> >
> > You are currently subscribed to ntdev as:
> > xxxxx@upek.com
> > To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> > xxxxx@lists.osr.com
> >
>
> —
> Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
> http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
>
> You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: unknown lmsubst tag
> argument: ‘’
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> xxxxx@lists.osr.com
>
>
> —
> Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
>
> You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: xxxxx@upek.com
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com
>

I used some debugger for some V8 CPU (embedded). Full of glitches, but in
general - can be used.

Maxim Shatskih, Windows DDK MVP
StorageCraft Corporation
xxxxx@storagecraft.com
http://www.storagecraft.com

----- Original Message -----
From: “Michal Vodicka”
To: “Windows System Software Devs Interest List”
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 10:14 PM
Subject: RE: [ntdev] Dual Opteron motherboard?

Alberto,

sure but even there WinDbg works better :slight_smile: Sorry, I don’t want to discuss it
here as I expressed my dissatisfaction with VSI UI several times during beta
testing and finally gave up. I believe it has satisfied users, my needs are
just different. And anyway, the main reason why I prefer SI is one computer
debugging.

BTW, I have to use embedded debuggers sometimes and comparing with them both
VSI and WinDbg are great, easy to use and rock stable :slight_smile:

Best regards,

Michal Vodicka
UPEK, Inc.
[xxxxx@upek.com, http://www.upek.com]

> ----------
> From:
xxxxx@lists.osr.com[SMTP:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] on
behalf of Alberto Moreira[SMTP:xxxxx@ieee.org]
> Reply To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
> Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 2:43 PM
> To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
> Subject: Re: [ntdev] Dual Opteron motherboard?
>
> Michal,
>
> You can always stick to the Visual SoftICE command window. The
> only thing is, it won’t show up in your monochrome monitor ;-).
> But, you know, once you get the hang of it, the interface’s not
> that bad; it’s like classical music, it grows on you the more
> you use it.
>
> Plus, if you already have DriverStudio, target installations are
> free!
>
> Alberto.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: “Michal Vodicka”
> To: “Windows System Software Devs Interest List”
>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 12:55 AM
> Subject: RE: [ntdev] Dual Opteron motherboard?
>
>
> Calvin,
>
> good to know ATI has 64-bit drivers. We plan to use X600 Pro. I
> understand switching wasn’t easy in early phase. Fortunately,
> our customers didn’t care too much so we could wait until other
> 64-bit drivers are available :wink: Yes, still it is necessary to
> check before.
>
> As for SoftICE, I meant using 32-bit “classic” version on 32-bit
> OS installed at dual Opteron. Theroretically it should work but
> better to ask, I’ll try Compuware. I don’t plan using 64-bit
> Visual SoftICE as user interface is horrible for me, even
> WindBag is better :wink:
>
> Best regards,
>
> Michal Vodicka
> UPEK, Inc.
> [xxxxx@upek.com, http://www.upek.com]
>
>
> > ----------
> > From:
> > xxxxx@lists.osr.com[SMTP:xxxxx@lists.osr.com]
> > on behalf of Calvin Guan[SMTP:xxxxx@yahoo.ca]
> > Reply To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 6:03 AM
> > To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
> > Subject: Re: [ntdev] Dual Opteron motherboard?
> >
> > Michal,
> >
> > SoftICE didn’t support any 64bit system until late
> > 2003 IIRC. We started developing 64-bit Radeon video
> > driver way before 64-bit S-ICE’s release, therefore, a
> > lot of S-ICE lovers had to switch to WindBag-:). Also
> > the driver support for amd64 and Itanium was awful.
> > Neither the onboard gigabit NIC has a 64-bit driver
> > nor did all other popular 10/100 nics. I had to build
> > my own 64-bit ndis driver to get my 3com905 online-:slight_smile:
> > That’s the story of victim of early 64-bit developers
> > a couple of years ago.
> >
> > Driver support is much better now, but still, as
> > Peter suggested, you’d better double check the
> > critical device such as video, network… I know all
> > recent ATi Radeon family adapters have decent 64-bit
> > drivers for amd and Itanium. Even the old Rage128/XL
> > (mainly on server platform) should work too. For nic,
> > I would recommend Broadcom’s NetXtreme gigabit nic and
> > Intel’s E1000.
> >
> >
> > Calvin Guan Windows DDK MVP
> > Enterprise Network Controller Engineering
> > Broadcom Corp. http://www.broadcom.com
> >
> > — Michal Vodicka wrote:
> > > We finally decided to make 64-bit versions of our
> > > drivers so I’d need a new development machine. It
> > > seems as dual Opteron is the best choice as I need>
> > > it for both 32 and 64-bit development and SMP is
> > > necessary. Now I’m trying to find complying
> > > motherboard. Has anybody an experience, good or bad,
> > > with Asus K8N-DL? Or any other mb which can be
> > > recommended or rejected?
> > >
> > > Also, I’d like to know how well it works in 32-bit
> > > mode. If I understand correctly, OS should work with
> > > no problem but what about special software as
> > > SoftICE and VMware? Any experiece?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Michal Vodicka
> > > UPEK, Inc.
> > > [xxxxx@upek.com, http://www.upek.com]
> > >
> > >
> > > —
> > > Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
> > > http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
> > >
> > > You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: unknown
> > > lmsubst tag argument: ‘’
> > > To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> > > xxxxx@lists.osr.com
> > >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
> >
> > —
> > Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
> > http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
> >
> > You are currently subscribed to ntdev as:
> > xxxxx@upek.com
> > To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> > xxxxx@lists.osr.com
> >
>
> —
> Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
> http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
>
> You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: unknown lmsubst tag
> argument: ‘’
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> xxxxx@lists.osr.com
>
>
> —
> Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
>
> You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: xxxxx@upek.com
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com
>


Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256

You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: unknown lmsubst tag argument: ‘’
To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com

> > VMware Workstation 5 works just great on Opterons on Windows and

> Linux 32 and 64-bit hosts.
>
What about 4.5 at 32-bit host on Opterons? I already
requested upgrade (because of multiple snapshots :slight_smile: but don’t
know how long it can take.

Opterons are fully 32-bit (Athlon) compatible so VMware Workstation 4.5
works on 32-bit host OSes running on Opteron CPUs.
It also runs on 64-bit Windows hosts but it is “experimental” feature
for 4.5. Workstation 5.0 is fully supported on 64-bit host OSes.

> For now it doesn’t provide 64-bit VMs but we are working on
that :-).
>
The real challenge would be 64-bit VM on 32-bit host :wink:

No, running 64-bit VMs on 32-bit host OSes running on 64-bit CPUs
is not too difficult.
64-bit VMs on 32-bit CPUs – yes, it would be a real challenge :slight_smile:

BTW, I use dual Opteron Tyan Thunder K8W (S2885).
According to Tyan web site it supports dual core CPUs.
My original motherboard was very unstable (machine check BSOD
every day) but it is rock-solid after replacement.

Dmitriy Budko, VMware

>BTW, I use dual Opteron Tyan Thunder K8W (S2885).

What mobos are considered to be better in the US - Tyan or Asus? Will a new
Dell be cheaper in the US then self-assembled machine based on Tyan or Asus?

Here in Russia it is Asus. Has a good reputation of a quality brand - though
not extremely cheap. The other mobos here are Albatron, Epox, Gigabyte,
Chaintech, MSI and possibly some others. Never saw Tyans in Russia.

Maxim Shatskih, Windows DDK MVP
StorageCraft Corporation
xxxxx@storagecraft.com
http://www.storagecraft.com

Hi, Michal,

You know, if all you have to do is to debug the hardware, then
your debugger’s going to be simple, compact, easy to handle and
rather fast. It’s when you have to bother with the vagaries of
the OS that debugging begins to become a hairy problem. SoftICE,
for example, was born as a hardware level debugger, and it still
keeps that flavor: you will notice that many of its original
commands were designed to be compatible with that mother of all
x86 debuggers, that is, debug.exe.

Alberto.

----- Original Message -----
From: “Michal Vodicka”
To: “Windows System Software Devs Interest List”

Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 2:14 PM
Subject: RE: [ntdev] Dual Opteron motherboard?

Alberto,

sure but even there WinDbg works better :slight_smile: Sorry, I don’t want
to discuss it here as I expressed my dissatisfaction with VSI UI
several times during beta testing and finally gave up. I believe
it has satisfied users, my needs are just different. And anyway,
the main reason why I prefer SI is one computer debugging.

BTW, I have to use embedded debuggers sometimes and comparing
with them both VSI and WinDbg are great, easy to use and rock
stable :slight_smile:

Best regards,

Michal Vodicka
UPEK, Inc.
[xxxxx@upek.com, http://www.upek.com]

> ----------
> From:
> xxxxx@lists.osr.com[SMTP:xxxxx@lists.osr.com]
> on behalf of Alberto Moreira[SMTP:xxxxx@ieee.org]
> Reply To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
> Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 2:43 PM
> To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
> Subject: Re: [ntdev] Dual Opteron motherboard?
>
> Michal,
>
> You can always stick to the Visual SoftICE command window. The
> only thing is, it won’t show up in your monochrome monitor
> ;-).
> But, you know, once you get the hang of it, the interface’s
> not
> that bad; it’s like classical music, it grows on you the more
> you use it.
>
> Plus, if you already have DriverStudio, target installations
> are
> free!
>
> Alberto.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: “Michal Vodicka”
> To: “Windows System Software Devs Interest List”
>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 12:55 AM
> Subject: RE: [ntdev] Dual Opteron motherboard?
>
>
> Calvin,
>
> good to know ATI has 64-bit drivers. We plan to use X600 Pro.
> I
> understand switching wasn’t easy in early phase. Fortunately,
> our customers didn’t care too much so we could wait until
> other
> 64-bit drivers are available :wink: Yes, still it is necessary to
> check before.
>
> As for SoftICE, I meant using 32-bit “classic” version on
> 32-bit
> OS installed at dual Opteron. Theroretically it should work
> but
> better to ask, I’ll try Compuware. I don’t plan using 64-bit
> Visual SoftICE as user interface is horrible for me, even
> WindBag is better :wink:
>
> Best regards,
>
> Michal Vodicka
> UPEK, Inc.
> [xxxxx@upek.com, http://www.upek.com]
>
>
> > ----------
> > From:
> > xxxxx@lists.osr.com[SMTP:xxxxx@lists.osr.com]
> > on behalf of Calvin Guan[SMTP:xxxxx@yahoo.ca]
> > Reply To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 6:03 AM
> > To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
> > Subject: Re: [ntdev] Dual Opteron motherboard?
> >
> > Michal,
> >
> > SoftICE didn’t support any 64bit system until late
> > 2003 IIRC. We started developing 64-bit Radeon video
> > driver way before 64-bit S-ICE’s release, therefore, a
> > lot of S-ICE lovers had to switch to WindBag-:). Also
> > the driver support for amd64 and Itanium was awful.
> > Neither the onboard gigabit NIC has a 64-bit driver
> > nor did all other popular 10/100 nics. I had to build
> > my own 64-bit ndis driver to get my 3com905 online-:slight_smile:
> > That’s the story of victim of early 64-bit developers
> > a couple of years ago.
> >
> > Driver support is much better now, but still, as
> > Peter suggested, you’d better double check the
> > critical device such as video, network… I know all
> > recent ATi Radeon family adapters have decent 64-bit
> > drivers for amd and Itanium. Even the old Rage128/XL
> > (mainly on server platform) should work too. For nic,
> > I would recommend Broadcom’s NetXtreme gigabit nic and
> > Intel’s E1000.
> >
> >
> > Calvin Guan Windows DDK MVP
> > Enterprise Network Controller Engineering
> > Broadcom Corp. http://www.broadcom.com
> >
> > — Michal Vodicka wrote:
> > > We finally decided to make 64-bit versions of our
> > > drivers so I’d need a new development machine. It
> > > seems as dual Opteron is the best choice as I need>
> > > it for both 32 and 64-bit development and SMP is
> > > necessary. Now I’m trying to find complying
> > > motherboard. Has anybody an experience, good or bad,
> > > with Asus K8N-DL? Or any other mb which can be
> > > recommended or rejected?
> > >
> > > Also, I’d like to know how well it works in 32-bit
> > > mode. If I understand correctly, OS should work with
> > > no problem but what about special software as
> > > SoftICE and VMware? Any experiece?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Michal Vodicka
> > > UPEK, Inc.
> > > [xxxxx@upek.com, http://www.upek.com]
> > >
> > >
> > > —
> > > Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
> > > http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
> > >
> > > You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: unknown
> > > lmsubst tag argument: ‘’
> > > To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> > > xxxxx@lists.osr.com
> > >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
> >
> > —
> > Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
> > http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
> >
> > You are currently subscribed to ntdev as:
> > xxxxx@upek.com
> > To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> > xxxxx@lists.osr.com
> >
>
> —
> Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
> http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
>
> You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: unknown lmsubst tag
> argument: ‘’
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> xxxxx@lists.osr.com
>
>
> —
> Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
> http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
>
> You are currently subscribed to ntdev as:
> xxxxx@upek.com
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> xxxxx@lists.osr.com
>


Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256

You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: unknown lmsubst tag
argument: ‘’
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
xxxxx@lists.osr.com

On Thu, 26 May 2005 10:10:48 +0400, Maxim S. Shatskih wrote:

>BTW, I use dual Opteron Tyan Thunder K8W (S2885).

What mobos are considered to be better in the US - Tyan or Asus? Will a new
Dell be cheaper in the US then self-assembled machine based on Tyan or Asus?

Tyan is known for, and knows, 2 and 4 CPU boards. They are specialising on
servers and workstation, not the mainstream market. But they are also often
a little more Abit like than Asus. In my eyes that mean they release the
board a little too early, with still quite a few BIOS issues to fix. Asus
typically release their boards more tested, but might also then be a little
later on the market with the same technology. Personally I have always used
Asus boards for single CPU, but for my first dual computer I choosed Tyan.

But it might also really depend on the design, when you look at the Tyan
K8WE board compared to the Asus K8N-DL, you see that the Asus board is
physical smaller. That does not really need to mean anything, but it is
also not always a good think to try to shrink a MB too much. The K8WE board
itself produces quite a lot of heat, and I really expect the Asus board to
do the same (but it does not have the chip for the PCI-X bridge). The K8WE
does also have space for a SCSI chip, even if you buy the non-SCSI version.

You also have IWill and Supermicro as known multi-CPU MB builder.

Multi-CPU boards from Tyan/Iwill/Supermicro do not seem to be very common
in Europeean shops at least, I guess mainly because multi-CPU computers are
still considered to be “special” hardware. Maybe the case in Russia too?

/Ola

> a little more Abit like than Asus. In my eyes that mean they release the

board a little too early, with still quite a few BIOS issues to fix. Asus
typically release their boards more tested

They also had BIOS issues with famous MBs like CUSL2 (i815 + Pentium III, year
2000).

Multi-CPU boards from Tyan/Iwill/Supermicro do not seem to be very common
in Europeean shops at least, I guess mainly because multi-CPU computers are
still considered to be “special” hardware. Maybe the case in Russia too?

Yes. Same is with SCSI hardware.

In Russia, stuff like Dell is considered to be elite and very expensive (around
1.5 more expensive then the self-assembled machine with Asus+Seagate+Radeon or
such). This is due to customs tariffs - they are lower on parts and high on
complete boxes.

Maxim Shatskih, Windows DDK MVP
StorageCraft Corporation
xxxxx@storagecraft.com
http://www.storagecraft.com

I remember IWill motherboards were sold in Belarus in year of 1997. Very
soon they earned reputation of very buggy and unstable motherboards (I dealt
with couple of such) and thus disappeared from the market forever. Did things
change?

On Thu, 26 May 2005 10:10:48 +0400, Maxim S. Shatskih wrote:

>> BTW, I use dual Opteron Tyan Thunder K8W (S2885).
>>
> What mobos are considered to be better in the US - Tyan or Asus? Will
> a new Dell be cheaper in the US then self-assembled machine based on
> Tyan or Asus?
>
Tyan is known for, and knows, 2 and 4 CPU boards. They are
specialising on servers and workstation, not the mainstream market.
But they are also often a little more Abit like than Asus. In my eyes
that mean they release the board a little too early, with still quite
a few BIOS issues to fix. Asus typically release their boards more
tested, but might also then be a little later on the market with the
same technology. Personally I have always used Asus boards for single
CPU, but for my first dual computer I choosed Tyan.

But it might also really depend on the design, when you look at the
Tyan K8WE board compared to the Asus K8N-DL, you see that the Asus
board is physical smaller. That does not really need to mean anything,
but it is also not always a good think to try to shrink a MB too much.
The K8WE board itself produces quite a lot of heat, and I really
expect the Asus board to do the same (but it does not have the chip
for the PCI-X bridge). The K8WE does also have space for a SCSI chip,
even if you buy the non-SCSI version.

You also have IWill and Supermicro as known multi-CPU MB builder.

Multi-CPU boards from Tyan/Iwill/Supermicro do not seem to be very
common in Europeean shops at least, I guess mainly because multi-CPU
computers are still considered to be “special” hardware. Maybe the
case in Russia too?

/Ola

I have a 2x opteron iWill mobo; it’s not great but it works. No
major complaints at this point. It was *very* picky about set-up and
RAM though.

On Jun 9, 2005, at 3:23 AM, Alexey Logachyov wrote:

I remember IWill motherboards were sold in Belarus in year of 1997.
Very soon they earned reputation of very buggy and unstable
motherboards (I dealt with couple of such) and thus disappeared
from the market forever. Did things change?

> On Thu, 26 May 2005 10:10:48 +0400, Maxim S. Shatskih wrote:
>
>>> BTW, I use dual Opteron Tyan Thunder K8W (S2885).
>>>
>> What mobos are considered to be better in the US - Tyan or Asus?
>> Will
>> a new Dell be cheaper in the US then self-assembled machine based on
>> Tyan or Asus?
>>
> Tyan is known for, and knows, 2 and 4 CPU boards. They are
> specialising on servers and workstation, not the mainstream market.
> But they are also often a little more Abit like than Asus. In my eyes
> that mean they release the board a little too early, with still quite
> a few BIOS issues to fix. Asus typically release their boards more
> tested, but might also then be a little later on the market with the
> same technology. Personally I have always used Asus boards for single
> CPU, but for my first dual computer I choosed Tyan.
> But it might also really depend on the design, when you look at the
> Tyan K8WE board compared to the Asus K8N-DL, you see that the Asus
> board is physical smaller. That does not really need to mean
> anything,
> but it is also not always a good think to try to shrink a MB too
> much.
> The K8WE board itself produces quite a lot of heat, and I really
> expect the Asus board to do the same (but it does not have the chip
> for the PCI-X bridge). The K8WE does also have space for a SCSI chip,
> even if you buy the non-SCSI version.
> You also have IWill and Supermicro as known multi-CPU MB builder.
> Multi-CPU boards from Tyan/Iwill/Supermicro do not seem to be very
> common in Europeean shops at least, I guess mainly because multi-CPU
> computers are still considered to be “special” hardware. Maybe the
> case in Russia too?
> /Ola
>


Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at http://
www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256

You are currently subscribed to ntdev as:
xxxxx@positivenetworks.net
To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com