Someone at Microsoft, please tell the documentation people that the Win
2000 DDK HTML documentation of the struct STORAGE_ADAPTER_DESCRIPTOR
differs from that actual definition in ntddstor.h. The data-type and
width of the field ‘BusType’ is wrong, and the docs indicate an additional
field, ‘CachesData’, which does not exist.
And WHY is the actual BusType field a BOOLEAN when, in the similar struct
STORAGE_DEVICE_DESCRIPTOR, it is the more logical STORAGE_BUS_TYPE?
Dave Cox
Hewlett-Packard Co.
HPSO/SSMO (Santa Barbara)
https://ecardfile.com/id/Dave+Cox
We will get it fixed.
Thanks for the feedback,
Eliyas
-----Original Message-----
From: COX,DAVID (HP-Roseville,ex1) [mailto:david_cox2@hp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 12:49 PM
To: NT Developers Interest List
Subject: [ntdev] docs: STORAGE_ADAPTER_DESCRIPTOR
Someone at Microsoft, please tell the documentation people that the Win
2000 DDK HTML documentation of the struct STORAGE_ADAPTER_DESCRIPTOR
differs from that actual definition in ntddstor.h. The data-type and
width of the field ‘BusType’ is wrong, and the docs indicate an additional
field, ‘CachesData’, which does not exist.
And WHY is the actual BusType field a BOOLEAN when, in the similar struct
STORAGE_DEVICE_DESCRIPTOR, it is the more logical STORAGE_BUS_TYPE?
Dave Cox
Hewlett-Packard Co.
HPSO/SSMO (Santa Barbara)
https://ecardfile.com/id/Dave+Cox
You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: xxxxx@microsoft.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to $subst(‘Email.Unsub’)