This Question is very specific to CITRIX environment so only CITRIX developers on this forum can entertain otherwise simply ignore>>
I have mini-filter driver and which does scanning of files after modification.
On Windows 7, 8.1 & 10 - x64 machines successfully able to monitor/scan files from published drive because PICADM.SYS => “\device\PicaDriveRedirector” is symbolic link with “\Device\MUP” or PICA is registered with MUP so we gets Pre & Post File I/O calls in driver.
But on Windows 7, 8.1 & 10 - 32 bit O.S observed very strange issues, Looks like CITRIX still using LEGACY file system redirection model. i.e They have separate device for network file redirection and which is not registered with “MUP”, due to that FltMgr didn’t come in picture.
Can any one please tell:
What are the parameters CITRIX follow to switch legacy Vs FltMgr
One point of clarification here. This is not a question of fltmgr vs.
legacy implementation since Citrix has implemented a redirector, whether
it is a mini-redirector (not FltMgr based) or a full redirector. It is a
matter of how they are registering with MUP. You would need to inquire
with them as to why they decided to do what they have done on x86 vs.
x64.
Pete
–
Kernel Drivers
Windows File System and Device Driver Consulting www.KernelDrivers.com
866.263.9295
------ Original Message ------
From: xxxxx@gmail.com
To: “Windows File Systems Devs Interest List” Sent: 8/23/2016 11:26:29 PM Subject: [ntfsd] CITRIX Still Use Legacy Network Redirector Model On Windows 10 x86
><< This Question is very specific to CITRIX environment so only CITRIX >developers on this forum can entertain otherwise simply ignore>> > >I have mini-filter driver and which does scanning of files after >modification. >On Windows 7, 8.1 & 10 - x64 machines successfully able to monitor/scan >files from published drive because PICADM.SYS => >“\device\PicaDriveRedirector” is symbolic link with “\Device\MUP” or >PICA is registered with MUP so we gets Pre & Post File I/O calls in >driver. > >But on Windows 7, 8.1 & 10 - 32 bit O.S observed very strange issues, >Looks like CITRIX still using LEGACY file system redirection model. i.e >They have separate device for network file redirection and which is not >registered with “MUP”, due to that FltMgr didn’t come in picture. > >Can any one please tell: > 1. What are the parameters CITRIX follow to switch legacy Vs FltMgr > 2. Why FltMgr model on x64 and LEGACY on x86? > >Thanks in advance. > >— >NTFSD is sponsored by OSR > > >MONTHLY seminars on crash dump analysis, WDF, Windows internals and >software drivers! >Details at http: > >To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at >http:</http:></http:>