Dear Mr. Divine,
I want to use Windows 2000 checked build right now, so that I am going to buy MSDN Professional. However, I am afraid that MSDN Pro not contain this version. Please confirm it to me, below is all packs of MSDN pro in detailed, please take a look.
Or where can I get Windows 2000 checked build version
Library
MSDN® Subscriptions Library, October 2004 Edition (English)
SDKs/DDKs
Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 SDK, Data Access Components 2.8, SQL Server™ 2000 Notification Services 2.0, Windows® Rights Management Services 1.0, Windows® Rights Management Client 1.0 (All Languages), DirectX® 9.0 SDK Update (Summer 2003), Mobile Internet Toolkit 1.0, Speech Application SDK 1.0, Systems Management Server 2003 SDK, Platform SDK - February 2003 Edition, VBA SDK Version 6.4, Windows® Server 2003 DDK, Windows® XP Service Pack 1 DDK (English)
Operating Systems
Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0, Internet Explorer 6.0 Service Pack 1, Windows® 2000 Advanced Server, Windows® 2000 Multilanguage Version, Windows® 2000 Professional, Windows® 2000 Server, Windows® 2000 Service Pack 4, Windows® 2000 Service Pack 4 Customer Support Diagnostics Tools, Windows® 98 Second Edition, Windows® Me, Windows® Services for UNIX 3.5 (English) icrosoft Virtual PC 2004, Windows Server™ 2003 -Enterprise Edition, Windows Server™ 2003 MUI Pack, Windows Server™ 2003 Standard Edition, Windows Server™ 2003 Web Edition, Windows® XP Home Edition, Windows® XP MUI Pack, Windows® XP Professional, Windows® XP Professional with Service Pack 1a, Windows® XP Service Pack 2, Windows® XP Tablet PC Edition (English) ISO CD images for: Windows® 2000 Advanced Server, Windows® 2000 Professional, Windows® 2000 Server, Windows Server™ 2003 Enterprise Edition, Windows Server™ 2003 Standard Edition, Windows Server™ 2003 Web Edition, Windows® XP Home Edition, Windows® Media Center Edition
2005, Windows® XP Professional, Windows® XP Professional with Service Pack 1a, Windows® XP Tablet PC Edition (English) Microsoft Windows Server™ 2003 Enterprise Edition - Volume License Version, Microsoft Windows Server™ 2003 Standard Edition - Volume License Version, Microsoft Windows Server™ 2003 Web Edition - Volume License Version, Windows® XP Professional - Volume License Version, Windows® XP Professional with Service Pack 1a - Volume License Version, Windows® XP Tablet PC Edition - Volume License Version (English)
Development Tools
eMbedded Visual C++® 4.0 with Service Pack 2, eMbedded Visual Tools 3.0 - 2002 Edition, MSDN® Library for Visual Studio® .NET 2003, Visual Studio® .NET 2003 Prerequisites, Visual Studio® .NET 2003 Professional, Visual Studio® 6.0 Professional Edition, Visual Studio® 6.0 Service Pack 6, Visual Studio® Tools for the Microsoft Office System 2003 (English) Visual FoxPro® 7.0 (German, Spanish), Visual FoxPro® 8.0, Visual FoxPro® 9.0 Beta (English)
Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SDK Beta 64 bit, MSDN® Library for Visual Studio® 2005 Beta, Visio® Tools for Visual Studio® 2005 Beta, Visual Studio® 2005 Beta, Visual Studio® 2005 Remote Debugger Setup Beta (English)
Library
MSDN® Subscriptions Library, October 2001 Edition (English)
“Thomas F. Divine” wrote:
“Paul Chen” wrote in message news:xxxxx@ntdev…
> 1. What will happen if TDIBuildReceive is called when there is no data
> available?
>
From the DDK:
“…the underlying transport fills the given buffer with received data until
the client’s buffer is full…”
Your callback will eventually be called when TCP can satisfy your read
request.
> 2. In my TDI Clientdriver, ClientEventReceive is registered, when there is
> data available, one event is set to notify the thread waiting on the
> event. The right process is, client sent request to the server, then
> waiting for the replication. When the server received the request, it
> replied the server, however, after accepted the request, the server is
> pending and ClientEventReceive won’t be called, then timeout in client
> occured. Why it is pending? Was the server scheduled out or anything else?
>
Don’t have a clue…
> 3. Is sending a large buffer(>30K) one time more reliable than packaging
> and sending it more times?
>
Since TCP is inherently “reliable” the size of the buffer won’t effect
reliability.
However, in terms of efficiency sending larger buffers is better.
Good luck,
Thomas F. Divine, Windows DDK MVP
http://www.pcausa.com
> Thanks very much for your advise.
>
> paul
—
Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: xxxxx@yahoo.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.