Re: Maximum interrupts per second

xxxxx@numega.com said:

I don’t know how much a PC can handle, but Linux is reported to be way
faster than NT as far as interrupt latency is concerned, so I imagine
that NT gives before the machine limits are hit.

I’ve measured with a 'scope 6uS interupt latency when running Linux,
and 60uS when running NT. Exact same hardware (dual boot) and I wrote
both drivers. The processor is in this case a Cyrix 6x86 P166. The
Linux kernel was 2.0.x, and the NT kernel was NT4.0 SP3.

Linux is way faster then NT for interrupt handling, this I know for
a fact, but that is not necessarily relevant to the original poster,
unless his customer is willing to make the switch.


Steve Williams “The woods are lovely, dark and deep.
xxxxx@icarus.com But I have promises to keep,
xxxxx@picturel.com and lines to code before I sleep,
http://www.picturel.com And lines to code before I sleep.”