You should join the beta and then there would not be this nagging NDA issue
regarding answering these questions, although I think the answer to this one
is out in the public.
=====================
Mark Roddy
-----Original Message-----
From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Michal Vodicka
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 1:23 PM
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Subject: RE: [ntdev] WDM and Softice
From:
xxxxx@lists.osr.com[SMTP:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] on
behalf of Doron Holan[SMTP:xxxxx@windows.microsoft.com]
Reply To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 6:04 AM
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Subject: RE: [ntdev] WDM and SofticeAvailability of source does not mean you can distribute your version of
it, just like the latest src licence for MFC. Now, I have no idea
about the src licence that will come with WDF, but the possibility of
read only/no distro is there.
I expected WDF isn’t distributed separately but compiled/linked to driver
instead, so modifying it shouldn’t cause more harm than modifying a DDK
sample. If developer creates a bug there, it would be the same problem as if
there is a bug in the driver written without WDF. But it is technical point
of view and lawyers can see it differently. Let’s wait until src licence is
available. Hopefully such scenarios will be considered.
Best regards,
Michal Vodicka
UPEK, Inc.
[xxxxx@upek.com, http://www.upek.com]
Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: unknown lmsubst tag argument: ‘’
To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com
Catch 22.