Thanks, Tim.
mm
Tim Roberts wrote:
Martin O’Brien wrote:
> I knew that it was old, thought I can’t say that I knew that the
> article was THAT old. Unless whoever ‘updated’ it was having an
> unusually bad day, that person really needs to be fired, in my opinion.
> …
> Incidentally, Tim, what ‘number’ of are you referring to that
> indicated to you that it was that old? The KB/Q#, 64K, other?The KB number, in the 250,000 range. Also, the fact that it says it
applies to Windows 95.15 years is probably too old. Based on the other articles in that
range, it was probably written in 1998.