The free OSR Learning Library has more than 50 articles on a wide variety of topics about writing and debugging device drivers and Minifilters. From introductory level to advanced. All the articles have been recently reviewed and updated, and are written using the clear and definitive style you've come to expect from OSR over the years.
Check out The OSR Learning Library at: https://www.osr.com/osr-learning-library/
We have a full file system driver (not a filter) which was using FsRtlRegisterUncProvider (without Ex) to deal with UNC translations. However, on a recent change, we started using FsRtlRegisterUncProviderEx and we are experiencing a big performance penalty that goes away by just using the older UNC registration routine.
1) Can all the I/O going through MUP be the reason for such a performance degradation?
2) Has anyone seen this before?
3) Is there any drawback on keep using the older registration routine on recent versions of Windows to workaround the performance issue?
Thanks in advance.
Fernando Roberto da Silva
DriverEntry Kernel Development
|Upcoming OSR Seminars|
|OSR has suspended in-person seminars due to the Covid-19 outbreak. But, don't miss your training! Attend via the internet instead!|
|Internals & Software Drivers||15 November 2021||Live, Online|
|Writing WDF Drivers||TBD||Live, Online|
|Developing Minifilters||7 February 2022||Live, Online|
|Kernel Debugging||21 March 2022||Live, Online|