Server 2003 SP1 DDK

NTDEV
1

I noticed the OSR online DDK was down and things seem strange with the
3790.1830 DDK I just downloaded. I believe is the RTM DDK. I installed the
DDK on Server 2003 SP1 RTM - AMD64. I didn’t see any mention of any issues
with using the DDK on this machine in the Release notes (I scanned them
quickly). First I was looking forward to a new DDK for a 64bit Traceview.
The Traceview is still broken. Says it’s looking for version 7 runtime
libraries when everything else is using version 8. It just kind of hangs
around until you kill it in Taskmanager. Then I noticed that the shortcut to
the DDK docs didn’t work. I have the DDK installed on my D: drive and the
shortcut had the folder name DOS mangled “3790.183~” or something like that.
I pasted the correct path in and it works. Does anyone know if this is the
real release DDK as it isn’t of the quality I have come to expect.

Steve Schrier

2

1830 is not the right build number for sp1.I believe it is quite a bit
higher than that. At any rate it seems that while w2k3sp1 is rtm the
w2k3sp1ddk is in an unknown state.

=====================
Mark Roddy
Windows .NET/XP/2000 Consulting
Hollis Technology Solutions 603-321-1032
www.hollistech.com

From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Steven Schrier
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 7:07 PM
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Subject: [ntdev] Server 2003 SP1 DDK

I noticed the OSR online DDK was down and things seem strange with the
3790.1830 DDK I just downloaded. I believe is the RTM DDK. I installed the
DDK on Server 2003 SP1 RTM - AMD64. I didn’t see any mention of any issues
with using the DDK on this machine in the Release notes (I scanned them
quickly). First I was looking forward to a new DDK for a 64bit Traceview.
The Traceview is still broken. Says it’s looking for version 7 runtime
libraries when everything else is using version 8. It just kind of hangs
around until you kill it in Taskmanager. Then I noticed that the shortcut to
the DDK docs didn’t work. I have the DDK installed on my D: drive and the
shortcut had the folder name DOS mangled “3790.183~” or something like that.
I pasted the correct path in and it works. Does anyone know if this is the
real release DDK as it isn’t of the quality I have come to expect.

Steve Schrier

Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256

You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: unknown lmsubst tag argument: ‘’
To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com

3

Thanks Mark.

Maybe I am just tired. I downloaded it from MSDN today and it had a posted
date “4/5/2005 11:44:00 AM” I used IsoBuster to extract the files from the
ISO which appeared to be labeled “RTM”. I did copy it from a different
machine as I couldn’t get the MSDN download manager to work on the 64 bit
platform. Maybe I screwed up somewhere.

Thanks.

Steve Schrier

From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Mark Roddy
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 7:38 PM
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Subject: RE: [ntdev] Server 2003 SP1 DDK

1830 is not the right build number for sp1.I believe it is quite a bit
higher than that. At any rate it seems that while w2k3sp1 is rtm the
w2k3sp1ddk is in an unknown state.

=====================
Mark Roddy
Windows .NET/XP/2000 Consulting
Hollis Technology Solutions 603-321-1032
www.hollistech.com

From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Steven Schrier
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 7:07 PM
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Subject: [ntdev] Server 2003 SP1 DDK

I noticed the OSR online DDK was down and things seem strange with the
3790.1830 DDK I just downloaded. I believe is the RTM DDK. I installed the
DDK on Server 2003 SP1 RTM - AMD64. I didn’t see any mention of any issues
with using the DDK on this machine in the Release notes (I scanned them
quickly). First I was looking forward to a new DDK for a 64bit Traceview.
The Traceview is still broken. Says it’s looking for version 7 runtime
libraries when everything else is using version 8. It just kind of hangs
around until you kill it in Taskmanager. Then I noticed that the shortcut to
the DDK docs didn’t work. I have the DDK installed on my D: drive and the
shortcut had the folder name DOS mangled “3790.183~” or something like that.
I pasted the correct path in and it works. Does anyone know if this is the
real release DDK as it isn’t of the quality I have come to expect.

Steve Schrier

Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256

You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: unknown lmsubst tag argument: ‘’
To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com

Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256

You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: unknown lmsubst tag argument: ‘’
To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com

4

I’ll take your word for it. You seem to be correct, this is available from
the MSDN site. I was under the impression that the build number was a bit
higher and that the release date for the ddk was a bit later.

=====================
Mark Roddy
Windows .NET/XP/2000 Consulting
Hollis Technology Solutions 603-321-1032
www.hollistech.com

From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Steven Schrier
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 8:41 PM
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Subject: RE: [ntdev] Server 2003 SP1 DDK

Thanks Mark.

Maybe I am just tired. I downloaded it from MSDN today and it had a posted
date “4/5/2005 11:44:00 AM” I used IsoBuster to extract the files from the
ISO which appeared to be labeled “RTM”. I did copy it from a different
machine as I couldn’t get the MSDN download manager to work on the 64 bit
platform. Maybe I screwed up somewhere.

Thanks.

Steve Schrier

From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Mark Roddy
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 7:38 PM
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Subject: RE: [ntdev] Server 2003 SP1 DDK

1830 is not the right build number for sp1.I believe it is quite a bit
higher than that. At any rate it seems that while w2k3sp1 is rtm the
w2k3sp1ddk is in an unknown state.

=====================
Mark Roddy
Windows .NET/XP/2000 Consulting
Hollis Technology Solutions 603-321-1032
www.hollistech.com

From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Steven Schrier
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 7:07 PM
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Subject: [ntdev] Server 2003 SP1 DDK

I noticed the OSR online DDK was down and things seem strange with the
3790.1830 DDK I just downloaded. I believe is the RTM DDK. I installed the
DDK on Server 2003 SP1 RTM - AMD64. I didn’t see any mention of any issues
with using the DDK on this machine in the Release notes (I scanned them
quickly). First I was looking forward to a new DDK for a 64bit Traceview.
The Traceview is still broken. Says it’s looking for version 7 runtime
libraries when everything else is using version 8. It just kind of hangs
around until you kill it in Taskmanager. Then I noticed that the shortcut to
the DDK docs didn’t work. I have the DDK installed on my D: drive and the
shortcut had the folder name DOS mangled “3790.183~” or something like that.
I pasted the correct path in and it works. Does anyone know if this is the
real release DDK as it isn’t of the quality I have come to expect.

Steve Schrier

Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256

You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: unknown lmsubst tag argument: ‘’
To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com

Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256

You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: unknown lmsubst tag argument: ‘’
To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com

Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256

You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: unknown lmsubst tag argument: ‘’
To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com

5

I have had a good experience using 3790.1184 for 64 bit, but not for 32 bit - I don’t recall the details, but my guys kept telling me that there was a bug or two in 3790.1184 that made it unsuitable for 32 bit, so we used plain vanilla 3790 or even 2600. I hve no experience with 3790.1830, can anyone share his/her opinions ?

Alberto.

----- Original Message -----
From: Steven Schrier
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 7:07 PM
Subject: [ntdev] Server 2003 SP1 DDK

I noticed the OSR online DDK was down and things seem strange with the 3790.1830 DDK I just downloaded. I believe is the RTM DDK. I installed the DDK on Server 2003 SP1 RTM - AMD64. I didn’t see any mention of any issues with using the DDK on this machine in the Release notes (I scanned them quickly). First I was looking forward to a new DDK for a 64bit Traceview. The Traceview is still broken. Says it’s looking for version 7 runtime libraries when everything else is using version 8. It just kind of hangs around until you kill it in Taskmanager. Then I noticed that the shortcut to the DDK docs didn’t work. I have the DDK installed on my D: drive and the shortcut had the folder name DOS mangled “3790.183~” or something like that. I pasted the correct path in and it works. Does anyone know if this is the real release DDK as it isn’t of the quality I have come to expect.

Steve Schrier

Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256

You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: unknown lmsubst tag argument: ‘’
To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com

6

Mark Roddy wrote:

1830 is not the right build number for sp1.I believe it is quite a bit
higher than that. At any rate it seems that while w2k3sp1 is rtm the
w2k3sp1ddk is in an unknown state.

???

Build 1830 was indeed the RTM build of S03 Sp1 and the DDK was built
during this build as it (almost) always is.

I noticed the OSR online DDK was down

Strictly an OSR Online problem and not related to the DDK itself. We
need time to get the updated DDK, get it installed, indexed, and
running. It’ll be back sometime after WinHEC/DDC. Between now and
then, nobody here at OSR has any bandwidth for ANYthing other than, ah,
WinHEC/DDC. And IDF Taiwan. And teaching classes. And… :slight_smile:

I installed
> the DDK on Server 2003 SP1 RTM – AMD64. I didn’t see any mention of
> issues with using the DDK on this machine in the Release notes (I
> scanned them quickly).

The DDK is indeed supported on AMD64.

First I was looking forward to a new DDK for a
> 64bit Traceview. The Traceview is still broken. Says it’s looking for
> version 7 runtime libraries when everything else is using version 8.
>

Why is the behavior your seeing “broken”? Did you get the V7 RTls that
TraceView requires? Does it work then? If there IS a real problem, did
you file a bug during the beta?

[In terms of updates, AFAIK the TraceView in the S03 SP1 DDK hasn’t
changed since, oh, build number 1300 or so. The next update is TraceView
V2.1 in the DDK for LH.]

Then I
> noticed that the shortcut to the DDK docs didn’t work. I have the DDK
> installed on my D: drive and the shortcut had the folder name DOS
> mangled “3790.183~” or something like that.
>

Oh, good heavens… I sure hope what you’re seeing is an abberation.

I don’t personally have an 1830 DDK installed, but there are folks here
who do. I’ll check if they’re seeing the same thing.

Peter
OSR

7

I was unable to find a 64 bit msvcr70.dll on my system. (I also realize that
this is not the only required dll.) The only thing I can find that appears
to be a 64 bit dll is the msvcr80.dll in the
“WINDDK\3790.1830\bin\win64\x86\amd64” folder. When I do run Traceview and
look in Task Manager I don’t see the “*32” so I am assuming that it is a 64
bit app and requires the 64 bit dlls.

Thanks, and good luck at WinHEC. I always look forward to your articles.

Steve Schrier

-----Original Message-----
From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Peter Viscarola
(OSR)
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 10:03 AM
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Subject: Re:[ntdev] Server 2003 SP1 DDK

Mark Roddy wrote:

1830 is not the right build number for sp1.I believe it is quite a bit
higher than that. At any rate it seems that while w2k3sp1 is rtm the
w2k3sp1ddk is in an unknown state.

???

Build 1830 was indeed the RTM build of S03 Sp1 and the DDK was built
during this build as it (almost) always is.

I noticed the OSR online DDK was down

Strictly an OSR Online problem and not related to the DDK itself. We
need time to get the updated DDK, get it installed, indexed, and
running. It’ll be back sometime after WinHEC/DDC. Between now and
then, nobody here at OSR has any bandwidth for ANYthing other than, ah,
WinHEC/DDC. And IDF Taiwan. And teaching classes. And… :slight_smile:

I installed
> the DDK on Server 2003 SP1 RTM - AMD64. I didn’t see any mention of
> issues with using the DDK on this machine in the Release notes (I
> scanned them quickly).

The DDK is indeed supported on AMD64.

First I was looking forward to a new DDK for a
> 64bit Traceview. The Traceview is still broken. Says it’s looking for
> version 7 runtime libraries when everything else is using version 8.
>

Why is the behavior your seeing “broken”? Did you get the V7 RTls that
TraceView requires? Does it work then? If there IS a real problem, did
you file a bug during the beta?

[In terms of updates, AFAIK the TraceView in the S03 SP1 DDK hasn’t
changed since, oh, build number 1300 or so. The next update is TraceView
V2.1 in the DDK for LH.]

Then I
> noticed that the shortcut to the DDK docs didn’t work. I have the DDK
> installed on my D: drive and the shortcut had the folder name DOS
> mangled “3790.183~” or something like that.
>

Oh, good heavens… I sure hope what you’re seeing is an abberation.

I don’t personally have an 1830 DDK installed, but there are folks here
who do. I’ll check if they’re seeing the same thing.

Peter
OSR

Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256

You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: xxxxx@rochester.rr.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com

8

I’m 99% sure that there is no such thing as a ‘msvcr70.dll’ for 64-bit,
since that would mean that the VS7.0 (aka .Net) compiler would have to be
ported to AMD64, which I’m pretty sure isn’t available in that incarnation.
Rather, the compiler available for AMD64 is the VS8.0 (aka .Net 2003 or
some such). Hence the DLL you’re expected to find is the ‘msvcr80.dll’.

This shouldn’t be a problem in any way, since the compiler used to build
64-bit binaries should be using the *80.dll, and the 32-bit applications
aren’t able to use 64-bit DLL’s…

–
Mats
xxxxx@lists.osr.com wrote on 04/08/2005 05:13:55 PM:

I was unable to find a 64 bit msvcr70.dll on my system. (I also realize
that
this is not the only required dll.) The only thing I can find that
appears
to be a 64 bit dll is the msvcr80.dll in the
“WINDDK\3790.1830\bin\win64\x86\amd64” folder. When I do run Traceview
and
look in Task Manager I don’t see the “*32” so I am assuming that it is a
64
bit app and requires the 64 bit dlls.

Thanks, and good luck at WinHEC. I always look forward to your articles.

Steve Schrier

9

Thanks but tried putting the msvcr80, and mspdb80 dlls in the folder with
Traceview. Traceprt was already there I believe. Still asks for the version
7 dll.

Steve Schrier

-----Original Message-----
From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Mats PETERSSON
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 12:26 PM
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Subject: RE: [ntdev] Server 2003 SP1 DDK

I’m 99% sure that there is no such thing as a ‘msvcr70.dll’ for 64-bit,
since that would mean that the VS7.0 (aka .Net) compiler would have to be
ported to AMD64, which I’m pretty sure isn’t available in that incarnation.
Rather, the compiler available for AMD64 is the VS8.0 (aka .Net 2003 or
some such). Hence the DLL you’re expected to find is the ‘msvcr80.dll’.

This shouldn’t be a problem in any way, since the compiler used to build
64-bit binaries should be using the *80.dll, and the 32-bit applications
aren’t able to use 64-bit DLL’s…

–
Mats
xxxxx@lists.osr.com wrote on 04/08/2005 05:13:55 PM:

I was unable to find a 64 bit msvcr70.dll on my system. (I also realize
that
this is not the only required dll.) The only thing I can find that
appears
to be a 64 bit dll is the msvcr80.dll in the
“WINDDK\3790.1830\bin\win64\x86\amd64” folder. When I do run Traceview
and
look in Task Manager I don’t see the “*32” so I am assuming that it is a
64
bit app and requires the 64 bit dlls.

Thanks, and good luck at WinHEC. I always look forward to your articles.

Steve Schrier

Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256

You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: xxxxx@rochester.rr.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com

10

I have no idea what I was thinking :slight_smile:

=====================
Mark Roddy
Windows .NET/XP/2000 Consulting
Hollis Technology Solutions 603-321-1032
www.hollistech.com

-----Original Message-----
From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Peter
Viscarola (OSR)
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 10:03 AM
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Subject: Re:[ntdev] Server 2003 SP1 DDK

Mark Roddy wrote:
> 1830 is not the right build number for sp1.I believe it is
quite a bit
> higher than that. At any rate it seems that while w2k3sp1
is rtm the
> w2k3sp1ddk is in an unknown state.
>

???

Build 1830 was indeed the RTM build of S03 Sp1 and the DDK
was built during this build as it (almost) always is.

> I noticed the OSR online DDK was down

Strictly an OSR Online problem and not related to the DDK
itself. We need time to get the updated DDK, get it
installed, indexed, and running. It’ll be back sometime
after WinHEC/DDC. Between now and then, nobody here at OSR
has any bandwidth for ANYthing other than, ah, WinHEC/DDC.
And IDF Taiwan. And teaching classes. And… :slight_smile:

> I installed
> the DDK on Server 2003 SP1 RTM - AMD64. I didn’t see any
mention of > issues with using the DDK on this machine in
the Release notes (I > scanned them quickly).

The DDK is indeed supported on AMD64.

> First I was looking forward to a new DDK for a > 64bit
Traceview. The Traceview is still broken. Says it’s looking
for > version 7 runtime libraries when everything else is
using version 8.
>

Why is the behavior your seeing “broken”? Did you get the V7
RTls that TraceView requires? Does it work then? If there
IS a real problem, did you file a bug during the beta?

[In terms of updates, AFAIK the TraceView in the S03 SP1 DDK
hasn’t changed since, oh, build number 1300 or so. The next
update is TraceView
V2.1 in the DDK for LH.]

> Then I
> noticed that the shortcut to the DDK docs didn’t work. I
have the DDK > installed on my D: drive and the shortcut had
the folder name DOS > mangled “3790.183~” or something like that.
>

Oh, good heavens… I sure hope what you’re seeing is an abberation.

I don’t personally have an 1830 DDK installed, but there are
folks here who do. I’ll check if they’re seeing the same thing.

Peter
OSR

Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256

You are currently subscribed to ntdev as:
xxxxx@hollistech.com To unsubscribe send a blank email to
xxxxx@lists.osr.com

11

I also have a good experience with 3790, even for user mode code.

Maxim Shatskih, Windows DDK MVP
StorageCraft Corporation
xxxxx@storagecraft.com
http://www.storagecraft.com

----- Original Message -----
From: Alberto Moreira
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: [ntdev] Server 2003 SP1 DDK

I have had a good experience using 3790.1184 for 64 bit, but not for 32 bit - I don’t recall the details, but my guys kept telling me that there was a bug or two in 3790.1184 that made it unsuitable for 32 bit, so we used plain vanilla 3790 or even 2600. I hve no experience with 3790.1830, can anyone share his/her opinions ?

Alberto.

----- Original Message -----
From: Steven Schrier
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 7:07 PM
Subject: [ntdev] Server 2003 SP1 DDK

I noticed the OSR online DDK was down and things seem strange with the 3790.1830 DDK I just downloaded. I believe is the RTM DDK. I installed the DDK on Server 2003 SP1 RTM - AMD64. I didn’t see any mention of any issues with using the DDK on this machine in the Release notes (I scanned them quickly). First I was looking forward to a new DDK for a 64bit Traceview. The Traceview is still broken. Says it’s looking for version 7 runtime libraries when everything else is using version 8. It just kind of hangs around until you kill it in Taskmanager. Then I noticed that the shortcut to the DDK docs didn’t work. I have the DDK installed on my D: drive and the shortcut had the folder name DOS mangled “3790.183~” or something like that. I pasted the correct path in and it works. Does anyone know if this is the real release DDK as it isn’t of the quality I have come to expect.

Steve Schrier

Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256

You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: unknown lmsubst tag argument: ‘’
To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com

Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256

You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: unknown lmsubst tag argument: ‘’
To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com

12

Thanks guys.

I will see if I can dig up the older one. The x86 version does seem to sort
of work. Except when I stop tracing (in TraceView) I get a page fault
bugcheck in the system WMI code after some thunking functions. At this point
it’s kind of hard to tell if it’s my new driver or I am using the wrong
tools.

Steve Schrier

From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Maxim S. Shatskih
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 4:31 PM
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Subject: Re: [ntdev] Server 2003 SP1 DDK

I also have a good experience with 3790, even for user mode code.

Maxim Shatskih, Windows DDK MVP
StorageCraft Corporation
xxxxx@storagecraft.com
http://www.storagecraft.com

----- Original Message -----

From: Alberto Moreira mailto:xxxxx

To: Windows System mailto:xxxxx Software Devs Interest List

Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 4:04 PM

Subject: Re: [ntdev] Server 2003 SP1 DDK

I have had a good experience using 3790.1184 for 64 bit, but not for 32 bit
- I don’t recall the details, but my guys kept telling me that there was a
bug or two in 3790.1184 that made it unsuitable for 32 bit, so we used plain
vanilla 3790 or even 2600. I hve no experience with 3790.1830, can anyone
share his/her opinions ?

Alberto.

----- Original Message -----

From: Steven mailto:xxxxx Schrier

To: Windows System mailto:xxxxx Software Devs Interest List

Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 7:07 PM

Subject: [ntdev] Server 2003 SP1 DDK

I noticed the OSR online DDK was down and things seem strange with the
3790.1830 DDK I just downloaded. I believe is the RTM DDK. I installed the
DDK on Server 2003 SP1 RTM - AMD64. I didn’t see any mention of any issues
with using the DDK on this machine in the Release notes (I scanned them
quickly). First I was looking forward to a new DDK for a 64bit Traceview.
The Traceview is still broken. Says it’s looking for version 7 runtime
libraries when everything else is using version 8. It just kind of hangs
around until you kill it in Taskmanager. Then I noticed that the shortcut to
the DDK docs didn’t work. I have the DDK installed on my D: drive and the
shortcut had the folder name DOS mangled “3790.183~” or something like that.
I pasted the correct path in and it works. Does anyone know if this is the
real release DDK as it isn’t of the quality I have come to expect.

Steve Schrier

—
Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256

You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: unknown lmsubst tag argument: ‘’
To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com

—
Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256

You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: unknown lmsubst tag argument: ‘’
To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com

—
Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256

You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: unknown lmsubst tag argument: ‘’
To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com</mailto:xxxxx></mailto:xxxxx></mailto:xxxxx></mailto:xxxxx>

13

On a related note to the SP1 DDK, Is there anyplace that I can download the Checked build of SP1 for server 2003? I’ve looked all over and can’t seem to find it anywhere.

Thanks!

-Jeff

“Steven Schrier” wrote in message news:xxxxx@ntdev…
I noticed the OSR online DDK was down and things seem strange with the 3790.1830 DDK I just downloaded. I believe is the RTM DDK. I installed the DDK on Server 2003 SP1 RTM - AMD64. I didn’t see any mention of any issues with using the DDK on this machine in the Release notes (I scanned them quickly). First I was looking forward to a new DDK for a 64bit Traceview. The Traceview is still broken. Says it’s looking for version 7 runtime libraries when everything else is using version 8. It just kind of hangs around until you kill it in Taskmanager. Then I noticed that the shortcut to the DDK docs didn’t work. I have the DDK installed on my D: drive and the shortcut had the folder name DOS mangled “3790.183~” or something like that. I pasted the correct path in and it works. Does anyone know if this is the real release DDK as it isn’t of the quality I have come to expect.

Steve Schrier

14

Try this:

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=F07A5E49-4A13-42CB-
898B-278A8B287E16
http:-898B-278A8B287E16&displaylang=en> &displaylang=en

Ken

_____

From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Lange
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 7:46 AM
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Subject: Re:[ntdev] Server 2003 SP1 DDK

On a related note to the SP1 DDK, Is there anyplace that I can download the
Checked build of SP1 for server 2003? I’ve looked all over and can’t seem
to find it anywhere.

Thanks!

-Jeff

“Steven Schrier” wrote in message
news:xxxxx@ntdev…

I noticed the OSR online DDK was down and things seem strange with the
3790.1830 DDK I just downloaded. I believe is the RTM DDK. I installed the
DDK on Server 2003 SP1 RTM - AMD64. I didn’t see any mention of any issues
with using the DDK on this machine in the Release notes (I scanned them
quickly). First I was looking forward to a new DDK for a 64bit Traceview.
The Traceview is still broken. Says it’s looking for version 7 runtime
libraries when everything else is using version 8. It just kind of hangs
around until you kill it in Taskmanager. Then I noticed that the shortcut to
the DDK docs didn’t work. I have the DDK installed on my D: drive and the
shortcut had the folder name DOS mangled “3790.183~” or something like that.
I pasted the correct path in and it works. Does anyone know if this is the
real release DDK as it isn’t of the quality I have come to expect.

Steve Schrier

—
Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256

You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: unknown lmsubst tag argument: ‘’
To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com</http:>

15

Thanks,
Not sure why I was having such a hard time finding that.

-Jeff
“Ken Cross” wrote in message news:xxxxx@ntdev…
Try this:

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=F07A5E49-4A13-42CB-898B-278A8B287E16&amp;displaylang=en

Ken

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com [mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Lange
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 7:46 AM
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Subject: Re:[ntdev] Server 2003 SP1 DDK

On a related note to the SP1 DDK, Is there anyplace that I can download the Checked build of SP1 for server 2003? I’ve looked all over and can’t seem to find it anywhere.

Thanks!

-Jeff

“Steven Schrier” wrote in message news:xxxxx@ntdev…
I noticed the OSR online DDK was down and things seem strange with the 3790.1830 DDK I just downloaded. I believe is the RTM DDK. I installed the DDK on Server 2003 SP1 RTM - AMD64. I didn’t see any mention of any issues with using the DDK on this machine in the Release notes (I scanned them quickly). First I was looking forward to a new DDK for a 64bit Traceview. The Traceview is still broken. Says it’s looking for version 7 runtime libraries when everything else is using version 8. It just kind of hangs around until you kill it in Taskmanager. Then I noticed that the shortcut to the DDK docs didn’t work. I have the DDK installed on my D: drive and the shortcut had the folder name DOS mangled “3790.183~” or something like that. I pasted the correct path in and it works. Does anyone know if this is the real release DDK as it isn’t of the quality I have come to expect.

Steve Schrier

—
Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256

You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: unknown lmsubst tag argument: ‘’
To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com