Rf. : [ntdev] RE: Should NTDEV *REJECT* postings-- in HTML?

What a great discussion :frowning:


=

=20
“Moreira, Alberto” =

=20
Interest List" =
=20
uware.com> cc : =
=
=20
Envoy=E9 par : Objet : [ntdev]=
RE: Should NTDEV REJECT postings in HTML? =
=20
xxxxx@lis =
=
=20
ts.osr.com =
=
=20
=
=
=20
=
=
=20
2002-01-24 14:22 =
=
=20
Veuillez r=E9pondre =E0 =
=
=20
“NT Developers =
=
=20
Interest List” =
=
=20
=
=
=20
=
=
=20

Frankly, I don’t know if I’m posting in html. Am I ?

Alberto.

-----Original Message-----
From: Gary Little [mailto:xxxxx@Broadstor.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:53 PM
To: NT Developers Interest List
Subject: [ntdev] RE: Should NTDEV REJECT postings in HTML?

Damn … There IS a way we can shut Alberto up!!! BAN HTML!!!

:slight_smile:

Gary G. Little
Broadband Storage, Inc.
xxxxx@broadstor.com
xxxxx@inland.net

-----Original Message-----
From: Moreira, Alberto [mailto:xxxxx@compuware.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 10:43 AM
To: NT Developers Interest List
Subject: [ntdev] RE: Should NTDEV REJECT postings in HTML?

I’ll ask again: what are the problems ? All it takes is to use a reader=

that
can handle it. The whole world’s on html. Many people read email with t=
heir
web browsers anyway. Even the Pegasus I use at home, a freebie, asks me=

politely if I want to look at an incoming email in html when it gets on=
e.
So, what’s the issue ? Or maybe we driver writers are supposed to be
technology-impaired when it comes to user level comfort and friendlines=
s ?

As I see it, “ban” is too strong a word. I, for example, run on an
html-enabled reader, and I don’t want to bother to figure out whether o=
r
not
an email happens to use html - to me, it makes no difference. Likewise=
, I
don’t want to have to care what format my email program puts out when I=

send
it - if it is html, tough, those who can’t handle it can just ditch it =
in
the nearest trash can. This is the twenty first century, eh ? The old
Compuserve DOS days over 2400 baud modems are long gone.

Alberto.

-----Original Message-----
From: Gregory G. Dyess [mailto:xxxxx@pdq.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:26 PM
To: NT Developers Interest List
Subject: [ntdev] RE: Should NTDEV REJECT postings in HTML?

Are you trying to ask a question and get it answered? Or are you tryin=
g to
show off how unreadable you can make your question and response? HTML =
has
WAY too few benefits to justify its WAY too many problems. Ban it or s=
trip
it.

Greg

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
> [mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com]On Behalf Of Moreira, Alberto
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:11 PM
> To: NT Developers Interest List
> Subject: [ntdev] RE: Should NTDEV REJECT postings in HTML?
>
>
> I must ask, why to ban html ? Except for people running html-disabled=

> readers, I don’t see any other reason, but then, do we really want to=
go
> back to DOS ? And what do you know, we use C++ for kernel
> development too,
> and we build our drivers on the MSVC shell. Part of being a
> developer is to
> evolve as new technologies are available !
>
>
> Alberto.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gregory G. Dyess [mailto:xxxxx@pdq.net]
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:12 PM
> To: NT Developers Interest List
> Subject: [ntdev] RE: Should NTDEV REJECT postings in HTML?
>
>
> HTML? Wipe them out. Wipe them ALL out! (Oops, wrong topic.)
>
> What’s important here? Is it the content of the question/response or=

> someone creativity with arbitrary color choices? Does all this
> nonsense add
> anything to the communications? I think not. It’s not an issue of o=
ld
vs
> new but rather does HTML’s capabilities add enough to overcome its ma=
ny
> problems. Again, I think not. When the issues of security come
> into play,
> there is no more room for discussion of any kind on the matter.
>
> It’s time to end this pointless debate and ban HTML entirely from thi=
s
> KERNEL-ORIENTED email list. If this were a graphics arts-related
> list, then
> I could see this conversation continueing.
>
> I vote for an outright BAN: Reject all HTML messages. Period. No mo=
re
> discussion.
>
> Greg
>
>
> —
> You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: xxxxx@compuware.c=
om
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-ntdev-$subst(‘Recip.MemberIDChar’)@lists.osr.com
>
> —
> You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: xxxxx@pdq.net
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-ntdev-$subst(‘Recip.MemberIDChar’)@lists.osr.com


You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: xxxxx@compuware.com=

To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-ntdev-$subst(‘Recip.MemberIDChar’)@lists.osr.com


You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: xxxxx@broadstor.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-ntdev-$subst(‘Recip.MemberIDChar’)@lists.osr.com


You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: xxxxx@compuware.com=

To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-ntdev-$subst(‘Recip.MemberIDChar’)@lists.osr.com


You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: xxxxx@motus.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-ntdev-$subst(‘Recip.MemberIDChar’)@lists.osr.com

=


You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: $subst(‘Recip.EmailAddr’)
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-ntdev-$subst(‘Recip.MemberIDChar’)@lists.osr.com