Personally I run both (softice locally), windbg catches anything
that falls past softice, and is good for real time debug output.
But I prefer Softice for stepping through code.
Rob Linegar
Software Engineer
Data Encryption Systems Limited
-----Original Message-----
From: Maxim S. Shatskih [mailto:xxxxx@storagecraft.com]
Sent: 07 December 2000 21:31
To: NT Developers Interest List
Subject: [ntdev] RE: To SoftICE’s developers at Numega> a waste of time, but this “numega sucks” thread has become
annoying and is
> off-topic. If you don’t like numega’s products or their
support take it up
> with numega.…and welcome to WinDbg. It has its own problems - though I
consider it as
a powerful and usable tool. It has rather good support
(thanks Andre Vachon
from MS for it).
It is also free - and how much DS cost?Max
You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: xxxxx@des.co.uk
To unsubscribe send a blank email to $subst(‘Email.Unsub’)