Hi Dan
It’s been ten weeks now; have you heard back from Neal?
Thanks
Lyndon
“Dan Kyler” wrote in message news:xxxxx@ntfsd…
> Hi Lyndon,
>
> Nothing yet. I believe Neal will reply to the list when he has answers.
>
> - Dan.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
> [mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Lyndon J. Clarke
> Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 4:25 AM
> To: Windows File Systems Devs Interest List
> Subject: Re:[ntfsd] Registry callbacks, transactions
>
>
> Hi Dan
>
> It’s been a week now; have you heard back from Neal?
>
> Thanks
> Lyndon
>
> “Dan Kyler” wrote in message news:xxxxx@ntfsd…
>> Hi Lyndon,
>>
>> I talked to Neal Christiansen, and it is a bug that the routine is not
>> exported. He is filing a bug report against it. He will also
>> investigate the time frame for the documentation as well, and get back
>> to us.
>>
>> - Dan.
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
>> [mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Lyndon J.
>> Clarke
>> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 8:28 AM
>> To: Windows File Systems Devs Interest List
>> Subject: Re:[ntfsd] Registry callbacks, transactions
>>
>>
>> Hi Dan
>>
>> Thanks for the starter so to speak. I see this function prototype in
>> WDK 5365 wdm.h (but not ntddk.h shame) however the function is not
>> exported from
>>
>> ntknlmp.exe (in the debug directory) for example and neither is it in
>> the public symbols. I also see in wdm.h a rather interesting
>> CmRegisterCallbackEx function prototype; this one is exported from
>> ntkrnlmp.exe etc. I find documentation for neither in the WDK docs.
>>
>> I appreciate the Microsoft folks are very busy with Vista at the
>> moment
>> but
>> some assist here would be very much appreciated.
>>
>> Regards
>> Lyndon
>>
>> “Dan Kyler” wrote in message news:xxxxx@ntfsd…
>>> It looks like the answer is CmGetBoundTransaction, although (as of
>>> 5308), it
>>> is undocumented, and returns a PVOID, with no obvious other calls
>>> prototyped
>>> to interpret the returned opaque object.
>>>
>>> The plugfest presentation on this a couple days ago did not give
>>> details of
>>> calls/data structures, but it did indicate that the model is similar to
>>> the
>>> minifilter transaction stuff.
>>>
>>> - Dan.
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
>>> [mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Lyndon J.
>>> Clarke
>>> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 12:03 AM
>>> To: Windows File Systems Devs Interest List
>>> Subject: [ntfsd] Registry callbacks, transactions
>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry about the slight OT post.
>>>
>>> Can anyone advise how in a Registry Callback I can determine whether
>>> the current thread is in transaction scope and if so the transaction
>>> handle of the current transaction scope?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Lyndon
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> —
>>> Questions? First check the IFS FAQ at
>>> https://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=17
>>>
>>> You are currently subscribed to ntfsd as: xxxxx@privtek.com To
>>> unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> —
>> Questions? First check the IFS FAQ at
>> https://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=17
>>
>> You are currently subscribed to ntfsd as: xxxxx@privtek.com To
>> unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com
>>
>>
>
>
>
> —
> Questions? First check the IFS FAQ at
> https://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=17
>
> You are currently subscribed to ntfsd as: xxxxx@privtek.com
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com
>
>
The missing export was added to the system the week after PlugFest. It
should be in Beta 2. If it is not please contact me directly.
Neal Christiansen
Microsoft File System Filter Group Lead
This posting is provided “AS IS” with no warranties, and confers no
Rights
-----Original Message-----
From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Lyndon J. Clarke
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 6:42 AM
To: Windows File Systems Devs Interest List
Subject: Re:[ntfsd] Registry callbacks, transactions
Hi Dan
It’s been ten weeks now; have you heard back from Neal?
Thanks
Lyndon
“Dan Kyler” wrote in message news:xxxxx@ntfsd…
> Hi Lyndon,
>
> Nothing yet. I believe Neal will reply to the list when he has
answers.
>
> - Dan.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
> [mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Lyndon J.
> Clarke
> Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 4:25 AM
> To: Windows File Systems Devs Interest List
> Subject: Re:[ntfsd] Registry callbacks, transactions
>
>
> Hi Dan
>
> It’s been a week now; have you heard back from Neal?
>
> Thanks
> Lyndon
>
> “Dan Kyler” wrote in message news:xxxxx@ntfsd…
>> Hi Lyndon,
>>
>> I talked to Neal Christiansen, and it is a bug that the routine is
>> not exported. He is filing a bug report against it. He will also
>> investigate the time frame for the documentation as well, and get
>> back to us.
>>
>> - Dan.
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
>> [mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Lyndon J.
>> Clarke
>> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 8:28 AM
>> To: Windows File Systems Devs Interest List
>> Subject: Re:[ntfsd] Registry callbacks, transactions
>>
>>
>> Hi Dan
>>
>> Thanks for the starter so to speak. I see this function prototype in
>> WDK 5365 wdm.h (but not ntddk.h shame) however the function is not
>> exported from
>>
>> ntknlmp.exe (in the debug directory) for example and neither is it in
>> the public symbols. I also see in wdm.h a rather interesting
>> CmRegisterCallbackEx function prototype; this one is exported from
>> ntkrnlmp.exe etc. I find documentation for neither in the WDK docs.
>>
>> I appreciate the Microsoft folks are very busy with Vista at the
>> moment but some assist here would be very much appreciated.
>>
>> Regards
>> Lyndon
>>
>> “Dan Kyler” wrote in message news:xxxxx@ntfsd…
>>> It looks like the answer is CmGetBoundTransaction, although (as of
>>> 5308), it is undocumented, and returns a PVOID, with no obvious
>>> other calls prototyped to interpret the returned opaque object.
>>>
>>> The plugfest presentation on this a couple days ago did not give
>>> details of calls/data structures, but it did indicate that the model
>>> is similar to the minifilter transaction stuff.
>>>
>>> - Dan.
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
>>> [mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Lyndon J.
>>> Clarke
>>> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 12:03 AM
>>> To: Windows File Systems Devs Interest List
>>> Subject: [ntfsd] Registry callbacks, transactions
>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry about the slight OT post.
>>>
>>> Can anyone advise how in a Registry Callback I can determine whether
>>> the current thread is in transaction scope and if so the transaction
>>> handle of the current transaction scope?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Lyndon
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> —
>>> Questions? First check the IFS FAQ at
>>> https://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=17
>>>
>>> You are currently subscribed to ntfsd as: xxxxx@privtek.com To
>>> unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> —
>> Questions? First check the IFS FAQ at
>> https://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=17
>>
>> You are currently subscribed to ntfsd as: xxxxx@privtek.com To
>> unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com
>>
>>
>
>
>
> —
> Questions? First check the IFS FAQ at
> https://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=17
>
> You are currently subscribed to ntfsd as: xxxxx@privtek.com To
> unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com
>
>
—
Questions? First check the IFS FAQ at
https://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=17
You are currently subscribed to ntfsd as: xxxxx@windows.microsoft.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com