after reading the thread I have just one question, if devcon
and setupapi.dll honour this flag, thrn setting this wouldn’t fail whql? in
whql they try disabling enabling drivers and that would be refused…is
that correct?
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Doron Holan wrote:
> Well both devcon and device manager both use setupapi.dll to do their work.
> the disableable policy is enforced at a lower level in the architecture,
> depending on the upper level components to enforce policy would lead to lack
> of enforcement 
>
> d
>
> Sent from my phone with no t9, all spilling mistakes are not intentional.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maxim S. Shatskih
> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 11:56 AM
> To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
> Subject: Re:[ntdev] Re:disable
>
>
> >Actually setting the bit prevents admins from disabling the device through
> device manager as well.
>
> What about DEVCON and SetupDi APIs? will they also fail?
>
> –
> Maxim S. Shatskih
> Windows DDK MVP
> xxxxx@storagecraft.com
> http://www.storagecraft.com
>
>
> —
> NTDEV is sponsored by OSR
>
> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>
> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>
>
> —
> NTDEV is sponsored by OSR
>
> For our schedule of WDF, WDM, debugging and other seminars visit:
> http://www.osr.com/seminars
>
> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>