Re: Re:Book on Processor Architecture - RANT

It is always the case that two books are vastly different from one to
another… So sure, it is a taste that matters. As an example, I heard
and/or read that intel is now having heuristic based caches L1, L2, L3 ( yes
one extra layer ) and these kinds of approach is sufficiently advanced, but
if someone gets the fundamental out of their way, following the advance path
should be an easy step …

  1. It is easy to read
  2. Has lot of exercise make one think.
  3. Extreemly close to what we do and think while on the keyboard doing
    systems programming…

HP is more useful for those actually try to design new processor families
and / or perf related work. For programmers I would say it is a second
choice. HP was also my text book for one semister long time back :-).

-pro
----- Original Message -----
From: “Spiro Trikaliotis”
To: “Windows System Software Devs Interest List”
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 11:35 AM
Subject: Re:[ntdev] Book on Processor Architecture

> Hello,
>
> Prokash Sinha wrote:
>
> > Assuming that, IF POSSIBLE, look at the book
> >
> > “Computer Systems - A programmers perspective” by Randal E Bryant and
David
> > O’Hallaron. Lots of exercise using x86 but using “as” and not very
> > difficult to convert to masm…
> >
> > This is a text of CMU undergrads, fundamentally sound and clear :-).
>
> I can second that this book is a good starting point. This book is
> really very easy to read. Anyway, it’s “just” a good starting point as
> many things are oversimplified. A collegue has partially used that book
> for making a university course.
>
> Regards,
> Spiro.
>
> –
> Spiro R. Trikaliotis
> http://www.trikaliotis.net/
>
> —
> Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
>
> You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: xxxxx@garlic.com
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com
>