On 20-Sep-2011 15:19, Mark Roddy wrote:
git and mercurial are great for multi-team distributed development,
for anything else they are rather unimpressive.Mark Roddy
I agree that GUI of Mercurial is not as polished yet as Tortoise SVN or
other svn clients, and DVCS in general is harder to use.
For personal and “solo” projects I still use svn.
But git and hg are known to better support
merge of diverged code lines. This is important for some.
(see reply from Steve Dispensa; 20-Sep-2011 04:27 )
And, having worked with all these, I won’t go back to P4, Seapine, or
heaven forbid, Clearcase.
Regards,
–pa
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Pavel A. wrote:
>> “Hagen Patzke” wrote in message news:xxxxx@ntdev…
>>>
>>> On 9/19/2011 3:09 AM, Maxim S. Shatskih wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Even the funny script which takes the SVN version and embeds this to the
>>>> .H and .INF files (with a .vbs script to work around the glorious STAMPIMF
>>>> timezone bug) can be ported using Exec task.
>>>
>>> So we are not the only ones doing this.Hopefully some kind soul
>>> will eventually extend svnversion with “stampinf” functionality.
>>>
>>
>> So many people are still stuck with svn. How about git? Mercurial? Fossil,
>> maybe?