Gentlemen,
please remember that there are “malicious users” out there that have been
impersonating users and using obscene language in other’s name. (I
personally have seen a clear pattern with the f***k word.) Please refrain
from cluttering up this list with probably mistaken anger at others
responses that seem crude and/or personal and/or extreme.
Thank you for understanding.
Gedon.
-----Original Message-----
From: Gary G. Little [mailto:xxxxx@broadstor.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 6:32 PM
To: NT Developers Interest List
Subject: [ntdev] Hate mail to my response to “Execution of Dynamically
Generated code”.
Sheesh … I don’t know what else to call it other than hate mail …
Ramii read what I wrote and evidently took great umbrage with it. Here is
his post:
Mr Little ,
if you are not interested in the topic please dont fuck the poster.ok
That things are important for me as I am doing research in security on
windows.
Why the hell you wrote like this
"The only place I would expect to see such code is that
brief interval when all of memory is being tested aftera power on. Using it
in a driver/application interface is an attempt to side step proper
implementation of a device driver, because the company is to cheap to do it
right, or the engineer is still in his “cute programming phase”.
Personally, I would invoke Greg Dyess’s injunction: “If this is a
commercially produced driver, please let me know the product name so I can
avoid wasting time with it.” "
Do you think you are great to decide somebody’s bussiness ??
if so I must tell you that you would be no more in the world.
Blodyfool…
Do do it again. I was asking for simpler way to do that ,not the fuck you
are talking.
Next time I will not excuse your bloody things.
Regards
Ramkrishna Pawar
xxxxx@rediffmail.com
Ramii,
First, go back to school. Your ability to put two English words in a
sentence is best expressed as illiterate, and at worse is unreadable. I do
hope your software is written in a more literate manner than your English.
Hmmm, of course it is … compilers reject illiterate drivel – but then the
compiler sets the rules as to what is determined to be illiterate drivel.
Secondly, in my country we have a little thing called a constitution, and in
that constitution we have a Bill of Rights and one of those rights is the
freedom of speech. In this particular instance, I took exception to an idea,
self modifying code, and expressed my opinion about that idea. In other
words I was exercising a basic right that I have in this country. Jan
Bottorof in turn replied with an articulate article about where self
modifying code can be most efficacious. I do note, however, that he still
did not advocate it being used as an interface between the Driver and the
Application.
You decided to get personal, Ramii, and threatened me. That is a very
childish response to negative feedback.
–
Gary G. Little
xxxxx@broadstor.com
xxxxx@inland.net
You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: xxxxx@intel.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%