Hi list,
Is tere someone who does or plans to do a port of the os2 JFS-driver?
It may also be a port from linnux-JFS to a NT-IFS
The OS/2 port is the basis on which linux-dev founds.
Are there developers, who are interested to help?
Robert K. schrieb:
Hi list,
Is tere someone who does or plans to do a port of the os2 JFS-driver?
It may also be a port from linnux-JFS to a NT-IFS
You are currently subscribed to ntfsd as: xxxxx@koepferl.de
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
I’d love to participate in some open source project like this though I’ve
not much time.
-htfv
----- Original Message -----
From: “Robert K.”
To: “File Systems Developers”
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 10:39 PM
Subject: [ntfsd] Re: JFS-port
> The OS/2 port is the basis on which linux-dev founds.
> Are there developers, who are interested to help?
>
> Robert K. schrieb:
>
> > Hi list,
> > Is tere someone who does or plans to do a port of the os2 JFS-driver?
> > It may also be a port from linnux-JFS to a NT-IFS
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > —
> > You are currently subscribed to ntfsd as: xxxxx@koepferl.de
> > To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
>
>
>
>
>
> —
> You are currently subscribed to ntfsd as: xxxxx@vba.com.by
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
>
What about ext2fsd at http://sys.xiloo.com ?
Matt
On 2002-09-02, you wrote:
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
I’d love to participate in some open source project like this though I’ve
not much time.-htfv
----- Original Message -----
From: “Robert K.”
>To: “File Systems Developers”
>Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 10:39 PM
>Subject: [ntfsd] Re: JFS-port
>
>
>> The OS/2 port is the basis on which linux-dev founds.
>> Are there developers, who are interested to help?
>>
>> Robert K. schrieb:
>>
>> > Hi list,
>> > Is tere someone who does or plans to do a port of the os2 JFS-driver?
>> > It may also be a port from linnux-JFS to a NT-IFS
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Matt schrieb:
What about ext2fsd at http://sys.xiloo.com ?
Matt
On 2002-09-02, you wrote:
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Yeah, its just ext2 fs. It hasn’t these wonderful b*-trees, no ACLs and
no custom Attributes.
At least ACLs are a must have for ReactOS. But we will include ext2fsd
as well into a distribution
Robert K.£¬
On 2002-09-04, you wrote:
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Matt schrieb:
>What about ext2fsd at http://sys.xiloo.com ?
>
>Matt
>
Yeah, its just ext2 fs. It hasn’t these wonderful b*-trees, no ACLs and
no custom Attributes.
At least ACLs are a must have for ReactOS. But we will include ext2fsd
as well into a distribution
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Yep. It’s just 0.09a. Journaling (Ext3) features are now being considered to
be added to the project. And other features will be implemented step by step.
Now it evolves slowly than predicted because I’m the only developer of it and
I have to do it at my own time.
Any help would prettily accelerate the evolution.
Best wishes,
Matt
http://sys.xiloo.com
“Matt” writes:
> Yep. It’s just 0.09a. Journaling (Ext3) features are now being considered to
> be added to the project. And other features will be implemented step by step.
>
What’s the current status, stability, missing features, plan?
Version numbers don’t say much.
Anyway, thanks, I appreciate your work.
/Tomas
>
Yep. It’s just 0.09a. Journaling (Ext3) features are now being considered to
be added to the project. And other features will be implemented step by step.Now it evolves slowly than predicted because I’m the only developer of it and
I have to do it at my own time.Any help would prettily accelerate the evolution.
Also I thank you for developing this FSD. I appreciate your work.
What do you think about ReactOS and about to include it into the
distribution?
I think including in CVS is not a good idea. AFAIK ROs is still not able to
work with exceptions correctly.