The old Wizard C compiler would put out a warning when people wrote code
like this, under the assumption that maybe the programmer really meant “==”
instead of “=”. I used to be very fond of that compiler, but hey, that was
way back when. Can Microsoft C be told to put out a warning too ?
Alberto.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bryan Burgin [mailto:xxxxx@microsoft.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 1:29 PM
To: NT Developers Interest List
Cc: xxxxx@mynetsec.com
Subject: [ntdev] Re: Implementing ProtocolReceive query
I assume this is a typo and not an intended assign:
if (Packet = NULL)
Bryan S. Burgin
xxxxx@microsoft.com
This posting is provided “AS IS” with no warranties, and confers no
rights
-----Original Message-----
From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Amit Manocha
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 10:57 PM
To: NT Developers Interest List
Subject: [ntdev] Re: Implementing ProtocolReceive query
Thanks Sanjeev.
I’m thinking of following flow for passthru for post-processing. Can
anybody
please go thro’ it and recommend/suggest somethings:
PtReceive ()
{
Packet = NdisGetReceivedPacket ();
if (Packet = NULL)
// Allocate myPacket, single buffer here and copy Packet into
myPacket
// I’m using single buffer, so all the data including header
goes
here
NdisReInitializePacket (myPacket);
}
else
{
// Allocate myPacket and single buffer
// Again, I’m using single buffer, so all the data including
header
goes here
NdisReInitializePacket (myPacket);
// Copy HeaderBuffer into memory allcated above
// Copy lookaheadbuffer into memory allocated above
// Call NdisTransferData with myPacket as argument
if (status == success)
{
// call PtTransferDataComplete. i read it somewhere in
archive
}
}
NDIS_SET_PACKET_HEADER_SIZE (myPacket, 14); // i’m sure i’ve
ethernet
// insert myPacket in the queue
return NDIS_STATUS_SUCCESS;
}
PtReceiveComplete ()
{
// remove myPacket from the queue
// post-process it
NDIS_SET_PACKET_STATUS (myPacket, NDIS_STATUS_SUCCESS);
NdisMIndicateReceivePacket (pAdapt, &myPacket, 1);
}
I’ll change PtReceivePackets later on.
Amit Manocha
“Sanjeev Manral” wrote in message
news:xxxxx@ntdev…
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > In DDK, I read:
> > “The intermediate driver must queue th copied net packets in
ProtocolReceive
> > so that they are available to ProtocolReceiveComplete for
postproessing”
> >
> > where to queue these packets ? user-specified queue or some internal
queue ?
> > If it is user-specified queue, can I be sure that the order of
insertion
and
> > removing the packets from this queue will not cause any problems.
> > If it is system queue, how to use this queue ?
>
> See macro.h in ndisuio DDK sample drivers to learn how to deal with
> queues.
> You should initialize these queues in your driver either in bind or in
> open.
>
> -Sanjeev
>
>
—
You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: xxxxx@microsoft.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com
—
You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: xxxxx@compuware.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com
The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It
contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named
addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose
it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately
and then destroy it.