FYI: SHA-1 is broken

NTDEV
1

I think some developers may be interested in the link from Bruce’s blog
archieve stating SHA-1 is found to be broken.

http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/02/sha1_broken.html

Regards,

Egemen Tas

2

Does not seems to be “broken” from nearly any practical point of view.

Maxim Shatskih, Windows DDK MVP
StorageCraft Corporation
xxxxx@storagecraft.com
http://www.storagecraft.com

----- Original Message -----
From: “Egemen Tas”
To: “Windows System Software Devs Interest List”
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 2:18 PM
Subject: [ntdev] FYI: SHA-1 is broken

> I think some developers may be interested in the link from Bruce’s blog
> archieve stating SHA-1 is found to be broken.
>
> http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/02/sha1_broken.html
>
> Regards,
>
> Egemen Tas
>
> —
> Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
>
> You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: xxxxx@storagecraft.com
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com

3

Maxim S. Shatskih wrote:

Does not seems to be “broken” from nearly any practical point of view.

Maxim Shatskih, Windows DDK MVP
StorageCraft Corporation
xxxxx@storagecraft.com
http://www.storagecraft.com

----- Original Message -----
From: “Egemen Tas”
>To: “Windows System Software Devs Interest List”
>Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 2:18 PM
>Subject: [ntdev] FYI: SHA-1 is broken
>
>
>
>
>>I think some developers may be interested in the link from Bruce’s blog
>>archieve stating SHA-1 is found to be broken.
>>
>>http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/02/sha1_broken.html
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Egemen Tas
>>
>>—
>>Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
>>
>>
>http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
>
>
>>You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: xxxxx@storagecraft.com
>>To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com
>>
>>
>
>
>—
>Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
>
>You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: xxxxx@gmail.com
>To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com
>
>
>
Correct. Yet, it has been broken not cracked.

4

It depends on what we define as practical.

Jamey

----- Original Message -----
From: “Egemen Tas”
To: “Windows System Software Devs Interest List”
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 3:22 AM
Subject: Re: [ntdev] FYI: SHA-1 is broken

> Maxim S. Shatskih wrote:
>
>> Does not seems to be “broken” from nearly any practical point of view.
>>
>>Maxim Shatskih, Windows DDK MVP
>>StorageCraft Corporation
>>xxxxx@storagecraft.com
>>http://www.storagecraft.com
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: “Egemen Tas”
>>To: “Windows System Software Devs Interest List”
>>Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 2:18 PM
>>Subject: [ntdev] FYI: SHA-1 is broken
>>
>>
>>
>>>I think some developers may be interested in the link from Bruce’s blog
>>>archieve stating SHA-1 is found to be broken.
>>>
>>>http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/02/sha1_broken.html
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>
>>>Egemen Tas
>>>
>>>—
>>>Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
>>>
>>http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
>>
>>>You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: xxxxx@storagecraft.com
>>>To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com
>>>
>>
>>
>>—
>>Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
>>http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
>>
>>You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: xxxxx@gmail.com
>>To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com
>>
>>
> Correct. Yet, it has been broken not cracked.
>
> —
> Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
> http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
>
> You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: xxxxx@tfb.com
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com