5484.4_WDK_B2.iso checksum

NTDEV
1

Hi All,

Where can I find checksum for WDK Beta 2? (5484.4_WDK_B2.iso)
I want to make someone else download it for me because of it size, and I
don’t want to get a corrupted one.

2

> Where can I find checksum for WDK Beta 2? (5484.4_WDK_B2.iso)

I want to make someone else download it for me because of it size, and I
don't want to get a corrupted one.
You see it on the very same page where you download it.

Oliver

May the source be with you, stranger :wink:

ICQ: #281645
URL: http://assarbad.net

3

Oliver Schneider wrote:

>Where can I find checksum for WDK Beta 2? (5484.4_WDK_B2.iso)
>I want to make someone else download it for me because of it size, and I
>don’t want to get a corrupted one.

You see it on the very same page where you download it.

Oliver
Thank you.

I’m downloading it from connect.microsoft.com and it needs Microsoft
File Transfer Manager to download. The Transfer Manager also does not
display any checksum.

Also I can’t see any checksums in the page with file link.

4

> I'm downloading it from connect.microsoft.com and it needs Microsoft

File Transfer Manager to download. The Transfer Manager also does not
display any checksum.

Also I can't see any checksums in the page with file link.
I am sorry. You are right. I was mistaking it for the usual MSDN downloads :-\

However, the transfer manager should take care of the integrity of the downloaded content, IMO no need to worry.

Oliver

May the source be with you, stranger :wink:

ICQ: #281645
URL: http://assarbad.net

5

Moavenat wrote:

> Where can I find checksum for WDK Beta 2? (5484.4_WDK_B2.iso)
> I want to make someone else download it for me because of it size, and I
> don’t want to get a corrupted one.

The checksum I get for 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso from Connect matches the
checksum MSDN has posted for en_vista_beta2_wdk_dvd.iso, which is an
SHA-1 Hash of dd3f4d9263d20cd1b176277826a5c1e47afd3f13.

Alan Adams

6

A minor point, and nearly all of us can “read between the lines” so we
know what you are really saying, but Vista 5484 has not been released. The
current CTP is 5384. Proofreeding and the backspace keys are your
friennnnd. :slight_smile:

Gary G. Little

-----Original Message-----
From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of alanadams@dr.com
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 1:59 PM
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Subject: Re:[ntdev] 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso checksum

Moavenat wrote:

> Where can I find checksum for WDK Beta 2? (5484.4_WDK_B2.iso)
> I want to make someone else download it for me because of it size, and I

> don’t want to get a corrupted one.

The checksum I get for 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso from Connect matches the
checksum MSDN has posted for en_vista_beta2_wdk_dvd.iso, which is an
SHA-1 Hash of dd3f4d9263d20cd1b176277826a5c1e47afd3f13.

Alan Adams

—
Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256

To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer

7

Another minor point: the copy of the 5384 WDK I downloaded from the beta
site is called 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso.

----- Original Message -----
From:
To: “Windows System Software Devs Interest List”
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 1:23 PM
Subject: RE: [ntdev] 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso checksum

>A minor point, and nearly all of us can “read between the lines” so we
> know what you are really saying, but Vista 5484 has not been released. The
> current CTP is 5384. Proofreeding and the backspace keys are your
> friennnnd. :slight_smile:
>
>
> Gary G. Little
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
> [mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of alanadams@dr.com
> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 1:59 PM
> To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
> Subject: Re:[ntdev] 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso checksum
>
> Moavenat wrote:
>
>> Where can I find checksum for WDK Beta 2? (5484.4_WDK_B2.iso)
>> I want to make someone else download it for me because of it size, and I
>
>> don’t want to get a corrupted one.
>
> The checksum I get for 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso from Connect matches the
> checksum MSDN has posted for en_vista_beta2_wdk_dvd.iso, which is an
> SHA-1 Hash of dd3f4d9263d20cd1b176277826a5c1e47afd3f13.
>
> Alan Adams
>
> —
> Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
> http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
>
> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>
> —
> Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
> http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
>
> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer

8

Unfortunately, the file is really named 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso. Check the download page for Windows Tools - Beta 2 (SDK and WDK); it isn’t the only mistake there. Really botched up.

BTW, Gary, how do you like AtaMini marked spews at the debug output?

Best regards,

Michal Vodicka
UPEK, Inc.
[xxxxx@upek.com, http://www.upek.com]

From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com[SMTP:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] on behalf of xxxxx@seagate.com[SMTP:xxxxx@seagate.com]
Reply To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 9:23 PM
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Subject: RE: [ntdev] 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso checksum

A minor point, and nearly all of us can “read between the lines” so we
know what you are really saying, but Vista 5484 has not been released. The
current CTP is 5384. Proofreeding and the backspace keys are your
friennnnd. :slight_smile:

Gary G. Little

-----Original Message-----
From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of alanadams@dr.com
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 1:59 PM
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Subject: Re:[ntdev] 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso checksum

Moavenat wrote:
>
> > Where can I find checksum for WDK Beta 2? (5484.4_WDK_B2.iso)
> > I want to make someone else download it for me because of it size, and I
>
> > don’t want to get a corrupted one.
>
> The checksum I get for 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso from Connect matches the
> checksum MSDN has posted for en_vista_beta2_wdk_dvd.iso, which is an
> SHA-1 Hash of dd3f4d9263d20cd1b176277826a5c1e47afd3f13.
>
> Alan Adams
>
> —
> Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
> http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
>
> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>
> —
> Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
>
> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>

9

Alan Adams wrote:

Moavenat wrote:
>
>
>>Where can I find checksum for WDK Beta 2? (5484.4_WDK_B2.iso)
>>I want to make someone else download it for me because of it size, and I
>>don’t want to get a corrupted one.
>
>
> The checksum I get for 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso from Connect matches the
> checksum MSDN has posted for en_vista_beta2_wdk_dvd.iso, which is an
> SHA-1 Hash of dd3f4d9263d20cd1b176277826a5c1e47afd3f13.
>
> Alan Adams
>
Thank you Alan.
Would somebody else kindly compute SHA-1 hash for 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso
again and post the result?

10

If you mean AtaMini spews on Vista, I haven’t had the joy of doing much
with Vista for the past few months. Mostly I have attempted to do an
upgrade on my home system, but that failed to get to the desktop, and
thanks to Max’s ShadowProtect I was able to re-image back to XP. The only
spews I have to deal with is the crap coming from the TPM driver on the
Dell Latitude that I am currently using as a test mule.

To the OP of this thread … Son of a gun … you are correct. The name of
the WDK is 5484.4… pardon me for ASSUMING it was your typo. I do note,
however, that they named the SDK properly. But I’m ASSUMING again since
the WDK might have gone through 5484 builds.

If anyone is looking for a low cost solution to bare bones backup and
recovery I would HIGHLY recommend Storagecraft’s ShadowProtect Desktop.

Gary G. Little

-----Original Message-----
From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Michal Vodicka
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 2:43 PM
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Subject: RE: [ntdev] 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso checksum

Unfortunately, the file is really named 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso. Check the
download page for Windows Tools - Beta 2 (SDK and WDK); it isn’t the only
mistake there. Really botched up.

BTW, Gary, how do you like AtaMini marked spews at the debug output?

Best regards,

Michal Vodicka
UPEK, Inc.
[xxxxx@upek.com, http://www.upek.com]

From:
xxxxx@lists.osr.com[SMTP:xxxxx@lists.osr.com]
on behalf of xxxxx@seagate.com[SMTP:xxxxx@seagate.com]
Reply To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 9:23 PM
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Subject: RE: [ntdev] 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso checksum

A minor point, and nearly all of us can “read between the lines” so we
know what you are really saying, but Vista 5484 has not been released.
The
current CTP is 5384. Proofreeding and the backspace keys are your
friennnnd. :slight_smile:

Gary G. Little

-----Original Message-----
From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of alanadams@dr.com
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 1:59 PM
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Subject: Re:[ntdev] 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso checksum

Moavenat wrote:
>
> > Where can I find checksum for WDK Beta 2? (5484.4_WDK_B2.iso)
> > I want to make someone else download it for me because of it size, and
I
>
> > don’t want to get a corrupted one.
>
> The checksum I get for 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso from Connect matches the
> checksum MSDN has posted for en_vista_beta2_wdk_dvd.iso, which is an
> SHA-1 Hash of dd3f4d9263d20cd1b176277826a5c1e47afd3f13.
>
> Alan Adams
>
> —
> Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
> http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
>
> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>
> —
> Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
>
> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>

—
Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256

To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer

11

Yes, I mean Vista. There are forgotten debug prints in ataport.sys (I reported it for 5381 but they haven’t it fixed in 5384).

We’re testing Vista mainly in VMware VMs but it isn’t useful for hw drivers.

Best regards,

Michal Vodicka
UPEK, Inc.
[xxxxx@upek.com, http://www.upek.com]

From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com[SMTP:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] on behalf of xxxxx@seagate.com[SMTP:xxxxx@seagate.com]
Reply To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 11:18 PM
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Subject: RE: [ntdev] 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso checksum

If you mean AtaMini spews on Vista, I haven’t had the joy of doing much
with Vista for the past few months. Mostly I have attempted to do an
upgrade on my home system, but that failed to get to the desktop, and
thanks to Max’s ShadowProtect I was able to re-image back to XP. The only
spews I have to deal with is the crap coming from the TPM driver on the
Dell Latitude that I am currently using as a test mule.

To the OP of this thread … Son of a gun … you are correct. The name of
the WDK is 5484.4… pardon me for ASSUMING it was your typo. I do note,
however, that they named the SDK properly. But I’m ASSUMING again since
the WDK might have gone through 5484 builds.

If anyone is looking for a low cost solution to bare bones backup and
recovery I would HIGHLY recommend Storagecraft’s ShadowProtect Desktop.

Gary G. Little

-----Original Message-----
From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Michal Vodicka
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 2:43 PM
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Subject: RE: [ntdev] 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso checksum

Unfortunately, the file is really named 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso. Check the
download page for Windows Tools - Beta 2 (SDK and WDK); it isn’t the only
mistake there. Really botched up.

BTW, Gary, how do you like AtaMini marked spews at the debug output?

Best regards,

Michal Vodicka
UPEK, Inc.
[xxxxx@upek.com, http://www.upek.com]

> ----------
> From:
xxxxx@lists.osr.com[SMTP:xxxxx@lists.osr.com]
on behalf of xxxxx@seagate.com[SMTP:xxxxx@seagate.com]
> Reply To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 9:23 PM
> To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
> Subject: RE: [ntdev] 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso checksum
>
> A minor point, and nearly all of us can “read between the lines” so we
> know what you are really saying, but Vista 5484 has not been released.
The
> current CTP is 5384. Proofreeding and the backspace keys are your
> friennnnd. :slight_smile:
>
>
> Gary G. Little
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
> [mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of alanadams@dr.com
> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 1:59 PM
> To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
> Subject: Re:[ntdev] 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso checksum
>
> Moavenat wrote:
> >
> > > Where can I find checksum for WDK Beta 2? (5484.4_WDK_B2.iso)
> > > I want to make someone else download it for me because of it size, and
> I
> >
> > > don’t want to get a corrupted one.
> >
> > The checksum I get for 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso from Connect matches the
> > checksum MSDN has posted for en_vista_beta2_wdk_dvd.iso, which is an
> > SHA-1 Hash of dd3f4d9263d20cd1b176277826a5c1e47afd3f13.
> >
> > Alan Adams
> >
> > —
> > Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
> > http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
> >
> > To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> > http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
> >
> > —
> > Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
> http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256>
> >
> > To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
> >
>
> —
> Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
> http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
>
> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>
> —
> Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
>
> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>

12

The dev tells me that the spew is fixed and we’re waiting to push it to
the main build.

-p

-----Original Message-----
From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Michal Vodicka
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 2:38 PM
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Subject: RE: [ntdev] 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso checksum

Yes, I mean Vista. There are forgotten debug prints in ataport.sys (I
reported it for 5381 but they haven’t it fixed in 5384).

We’re testing Vista mainly in VMware VMs but it isn’t useful for hw
drivers.

Best regards,

Michal Vodicka
UPEK, Inc.
[xxxxx@upek.com, http://www.upek.com]

From:
xxxxx@lists.osr.com[SMTP:xxxxx@lists.osr.com
] on behalf of xxxxx@seagate.com[SMTP:xxxxx@seagate.com]
Reply To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 11:18 PM
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Subject: RE: [ntdev] 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso checksum

If you mean AtaMini spews on Vista, I haven’t had the joy of doing
much with Vista for the past few months. Mostly I have attempted to do

an upgrade on my home system, but that failed to get to the desktop,
and thanks to Max’s ShadowProtect I was able to re-image back to XP.
The only spews I have to deal with is the crap coming from the TPM
driver on the Dell Latitude that I am currently using as a test mule.

To the OP of this thread … Son of a gun … you are correct. The
name of the WDK is 5484.4… pardon me for ASSUMING it was your typo.
I do note, however, that they named the SDK properly. But I’m ASSUMING

again since the WDK might have gone through 5484 builds.

If anyone is looking for a low cost solution to bare bones backup and
recovery I would HIGHLY recommend Storagecraft’s ShadowProtect
Desktop.

Gary G. Little

-----Original Message-----
From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Michal Vodicka
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 2:43 PM
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Subject: RE: [ntdev] 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso checksum

Unfortunately, the file is really named 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso. Check the
download page for Windows Tools - Beta 2 (SDK and WDK); it isn’t the
only mistake there. Really botched up.

BTW, Gary, how do you like AtaMini marked spews at the debug output?

Best regards,

Michal Vodicka
UPEK, Inc.
[xxxxx@upek.com, http://www.upek.com]

> ----------
> From:
xxxxx@lists.osr.com[SMTP:xxxxx@lists.osr.c
om] on behalf of
xxxxx@seagate.com[SMTP:xxxxx@seagate.com]
> Reply To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 9:23 PM
> To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
> Subject: RE: [ntdev] 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso checksum
>
> A minor point, and nearly all of us can “read between the lines” so
> we know what you are really saying, but Vista 5484 has not been
released.
The
> current CTP is 5384. Proofreeding and the backspace keys are your
> friennnnd. :slight_smile:
>
>
> Gary G. Little
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
> [mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of
> alanadams@dr.com
> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 1:59 PM
> To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
> Subject: Re:[ntdev] 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso checksum
>
> Moavenat wrote:
> >
> > > Where can I find checksum for WDK Beta 2? (5484.4_WDK_B2.iso) I
> > > want to make someone else download it for me because of it size,
> > > and
> I
> >
> > > don’t want to get a corrupted one.
> >
> > The checksum I get for 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso from Connect matches the
> > checksum MSDN has posted for en_vista_beta2_wdk_dvd.iso, which is an
> > SHA-1 Hash of dd3f4d9263d20cd1b176277826a5c1e47afd3f13.
> >
> > Alan Adams
> >
> > —
> > Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
> > http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
> >
> > To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> > http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
> >
> > —
> > Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
> http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256>
> >
> > To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
> >
>
> —
> Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
> http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
>
> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>
> —
> Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
> http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
>
> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>

—
Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256

To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer

13

Good news, thanks.

Best regards,

Michal Vodicka
UPEK, Inc.
[xxxxx@upek.com, http://www.upek.com]

From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com[SMTP:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] on behalf of Peter Wieland[SMTP:xxxxx@windows.microsoft.com]
Reply To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2006 12:16 AM
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Subject: RE: [ntdev] 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso checksum

The dev tells me that the spew is fixed and we’re waiting to push it to
the main build.

-p

-----Original Message-----
From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Michal Vodicka
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 2:38 PM
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Subject: RE: [ntdev] 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso checksum

Yes, I mean Vista. There are forgotten debug prints in ataport.sys (I
reported it for 5381 but they haven’t it fixed in 5384).

We’re testing Vista mainly in VMware VMs but it isn’t useful for hw
drivers.

Best regards,

Michal Vodicka
UPEK, Inc.
[xxxxx@upek.com, http://www.upek.com]

> ----------
> From:
xxxxx@lists.osr.com[SMTP:xxxxx@lists.osr.com
] on behalf of xxxxx@seagate.com[SMTP:xxxxx@seagate.com]
> Reply To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 11:18 PM
> To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
> Subject: RE: [ntdev] 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso checksum
>
> If you mean AtaMini spews on Vista, I haven’t had the joy of doing
> much with Vista for the past few months. Mostly I have attempted to do

> an upgrade on my home system, but that failed to get to the desktop,
> and thanks to Max’s ShadowProtect I was able to re-image back to XP.
> The only spews I have to deal with is the crap coming from the TPM
> driver on the Dell Latitude that I am currently using as a test mule.
>
> To the OP of this thread … Son of a gun … you are correct. The
> name of the WDK is 5484.4… pardon me for ASSUMING it was your typo.
> I do note, however, that they named the SDK properly. But I’m ASSUMING

> again since the WDK might have gone through 5484 builds.
>
> If anyone is looking for a low cost solution to bare bones backup and
> recovery I would HIGHLY recommend Storagecraft’s ShadowProtect
Desktop.
>
> Gary G. Little
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
> [mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of Michal Vodicka
> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 2:43 PM
> To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
> Subject: RE: [ntdev] 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso checksum
>
> Unfortunately, the file is really named 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso. Check the
> download page for Windows Tools - Beta 2 (SDK and WDK); it isn’t the
> only mistake there. Really botched up.
>
> BTW, Gary, how do you like AtaMini marked spews at the debug output?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Michal Vodicka
> UPEK, Inc.
> [xxxxx@upek.com, http://www.upek.com]
>
>
> > ----------
> > From:
> xxxxx@lists.osr.com[SMTP:xxxxx@lists.osr.c
> om] on behalf of
> xxxxx@seagate.com[SMTP:xxxxx@seagate.com]
> > Reply To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
> > Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 9:23 PM
> > To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
> > Subject: RE: [ntdev] 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso checksum
> >
> > A minor point, and nearly all of us can “read between the lines” so
> > we know what you are really saying, but Vista 5484 has not been
released.
> The
> > current CTP is 5384. Proofreeding and the backspace keys are your
> > friennnnd. :slight_smile:
> >
> >
> > Gary G. Little
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com >
> > [mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of
> > alanadams@dr.com
> > Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 1:59 PM
> > To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
> > Subject: Re:[ntdev] 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso checksum
> >
> > Moavenat wrote:
> > >
> > > > Where can I find checksum for WDK Beta 2? (5484.4_WDK_B2.iso) I
> > > > want to make someone else download it for me because of it size,
> > > > and
> > I
> > >
> > > > don’t want to get a corrupted one.
> > >
> > > The checksum I get for 5484.4_WDK_B2.iso from Connect matches the
> > > checksum MSDN has posted for en_vista_beta2_wdk_dvd.iso, which is an
> > > SHA-1 Hash of dd3f4d9263d20cd1b176277826a5c1e47afd3f13.
> > >
> > > Alan Adams
> > >
> > > —
> > > Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
> > > http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> > > http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
> > >
> > > —
> > > Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
> > http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256>
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> > http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
> > >
> >
> > —
> > Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
> > http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
> >
> > To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> > http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
> >
> > —
> > Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
> > http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
> >
> > To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> > http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
> >
>
> —
> Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
> http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
>
> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at
> http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>
>
> —
> Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
>
> To unsubscribe, visit the List Server section of OSR Online at http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=ListServer
>