Hello ,
Is it possible to implement one more level of real cache below current virtually indexed cache ? Please suggest me your views for how can it be achieved ?
Thanx.
Akshay R. Kunkulol.
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
You are talking about the storage system cache, right? You could cache
above the physical disk or volume, however it is not clear that this would
buy you much.
From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com] On Behalf Of akshay kunkulol
Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2004 3:30 AM
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Subject: [ntdev] 2 level cache
Hello ,
Is it possible to implement one more level of real cache below current
virtually indexed cache ? Please suggest me your views for how can it be
achieved ?
Thanx.
Akshay R. Kunkulol.
Do you Yahoo!?
New
http:_mail/static/efficiency.html> and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
— Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256 You are currently subscribed to
ntdev as: xxxxx@hollistech.com To unsubscribe send a blank email to
xxxxx@lists.osr.com</http:>
For what?
“Cache over cache” has advantages only if the “upper” cache is in faster storage then the “lower” one. Otherwise, you will achieve nothing but overhead on memcpy().
Maxim Shatskih, Windows DDK MVP
StorageCraft Corporation
xxxxx@storagecraft.com
http://www.storagecraft.com
----- Original Message -----
From: akshay kunkulol
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2004 11:29 AM
Subject: [ntdev] 2 level cache
Hello ,
Is it possible to implement one more level of real cache below current virtually indexed cache ? Please suggest me your views for how can it be achieved ?
Thanx.
Akshay R. Kunkulol.
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! — Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256 You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: xxxxx@storagecraft.com To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com
I think the person is up for rich media streaming, yet another black-art 
-pro
-----Original Message-----
From: xxxxx@lists.osr.com
[mailto:xxxxx@lists.osr.com]On Behalf Of Maxim S. Shatskih
Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2004 8:13 AM
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Subject: Re: [ntdev] 2 level cache
For what?
"Cache over cache" has advantages only if the "upper" cache is in
faster storage then the "lower" one. Otherwise, you will achieve nothing but
overhead on memcpy().
Maxim Shatskih, Windows DDK MVP
StorageCraft Corporation
xxxxx@storagecraft.com
http://www.storagecraft.com
----- Original Message -----
From: akshay kunkulol
To: Windows System Software Devs Interest List
Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2004 11:29 AM
Subject: [ntdev] 2 level cache
Hello ,
Is it possible to implement one more level of real cache below current
virtually indexed cache ? Please suggest me your views for how can it be
achieved ?
Thanx.
Akshay R. Kunkulol.
Questions? First check the Kernel Driver FAQ at
http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=256
You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: xxxxx@garlic.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to xxxxx@lists.osr.com