I guess that your statement may hold true under the condition that user is warned about these features
BEFORE purchasing your product and is allowed to cleanly uninstall it (or explicitly warned of inability to do so).
After all, it does not conflict with Tim’s and Max’s statements in any possible way - indeed, it is user’s computer, and it is his/her/its right to install a product that effectively strips him/her/it of his/her/its right to control his/her/its own machine in the name of the “security”. Such a product is not necessarily bound to be as unattractive to the end users is it may seem to at the first glance. Instead, it may be VERY attractive to some ( just look at Mac users if you don’t believe it - they are ready to spend a night in a queue in order to be among the first ones who had purchased a new upgrade of a product that controls their every move).
However, users just have to be warned - otherwise, you product is nothing more than just a piece of a malware with a high potential of landing its authors in a courtroom…
Anton Bassov