Windows System Software -- Consulting, Training, Development -- Unique Expertise, Guaranteed Results
The free OSR Learning Library has more than 50 articles on a wide variety of topics about writing and debugging device drivers and Minifilters. From introductory level to advanced. All the articles have been recently reviewed and updated, and are written using the clear and definitive style you've come to expect from OSR over the years.
Check out The OSR Learning Library at: https://www.osr.com/osr-learning-library/
Upcoming OSR Seminars | ||
---|---|---|
OSR has suspended in-person seminars due to the Covid-19 outbreak. But, don't miss your training! Attend via the internet instead! | ||
Internals & Software Drivers | 7 February 2022 | Live, Online |
Kernel Debugging | 21 March 2022 | Live, Online |
Developing Minifilters | 23 May 2022 | Live, Online |
Writing WDF Drivers | 12 September 2022 | Live, Online |
Comments
associating "reenabling" with "resetting". However, it isn't very clear.
Do I need to reset the event manually even though I am calling a
"reenabling" function? Thanks.
Scott Meeuwsen
High Level Software, Ltd.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Meeuwsen" <[email protected]>
To: "NT Developers Interest List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2000 11:43 AM
Subject: [ntdev] Winsock2 woes... (Possible bug?)
> PROBLEM: recvfrom is not resetting FD_READ event set with WSAEventSelect.
> PLATFORM: Windows 2000 Advanced Server, Build 2195
> SPECIFICS:
>
> Socket specs:
> -PF_INET (TCP/IP)
> -SOCK_DGRAM (UDP)
> -SO_BROADCAST
>
> Read Loop:
> -Create event using WSACreateEvent
> -Register for FD_READ event using WSAEventSelect
> -Enter loop
> -Wait on event
> -Issue a recvfrom to get data*
> -Loop
>
> *this should reset read event (if no data, which there is not), but does
not
> so future invocations return WSAWOULDBLOCK and the loop runs infinitely
> eating up the CPU.
>
> Miscellaneous:
> -Packet that is received is sent from the same machine.
> -If I use an auto reset event it appears to work okay, but this should not
> be necessary according to docs (plus what if condition is still true,
would
> have to wait for next packet before processing previous data then)
> -Same socket is used for both sends and receives (Tried using different
one
> as well, no luck)
>
> I have used this same algorithm before under NT 4.0 and it seemed to work
> fine. I would appreciate it if someone can confirm this as a bug or if
> there is something I am doing incorrectly. Thanks...
>
> Scott Meeuwsen
> High Level Software, Ltd.
>
>
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to ntdev as: [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to $subst('Email.Unsub')
>
>