Windows System Software -- Consulting, Training, Development -- Unique Expertise, Guaranteed Results

Before Posting...
Please check out the Community Guidelines in the Announcements and Administration Category.


MDHMDH Member Posts: 13

Seems like FsRtlIsNameInExpression was made specifically for directory messages but according to the docs, it must be called at PASSIVE while IRP_MJ_DIRECTORY_CONTROL can be called at APC ( Am I missing something here or is it really not safe to call this from the pre-op?


  • Scott_Noone_(OSR)Scott_Noone_(OSR) Administrator Posts: 3,150

    You're fine, FsRtlIsNameInExpression isn't going to do anything that requires an APC. If you want extra proof you can see that FAT calls FsRtlIsNameInExpression in the directory control handler so if it's not safe we're all doomed...(FatQueryDirectory->FatLocateDirent->FsRtlIsNameInExpression)


  • MDHMDH Member Posts: 13

    Thanks Scott. I noticed it also gets called in CDFS as well. So does that mean that it'd also be safe to call when holding a guarded mutex regardless of what this ( says?

    "In particular, kernel routines that are illegal to call at IRQL = APC_LEVEL should not be called from a code path that is protected by either a fast mutex or a guarded mutex."

  • Scott_Noone_(OSR)Scott_Noone_(OSR) Administrator Posts: 3,150

    Yes, that would be fine. The Rtl/FsRtl routines are generally overly restrictive in the documentation by saying they require PASSIVE_LEVEL.

    APC_LEVEL or PASSIVE_LEVEL in a Guarded Region mostly don't matter until you try to synchronously call an I/O Zw routine with APCs disabled (because they use APCs to signal completion).


Sign In or Register to comment.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Upcoming OSR Seminars
Developing Minifilters 29 July 2019 OSR Seminar Space
Writing WDF Drivers 23 Sept 2019 OSR Seminar Space
Kernel Debugging 21 Oct 2019 OSR Seminar Space
Internals & Software Drivers 18 Nov 2019 Dulles, VA